it is better for students to understand ideas and concepts than learning facts
In the last three decades, educating children has changed drastically. Some people believe teaching kids facts is crucial since it informs them of the reality of the world; however, others claim that it is better for students to understand ideas and concepts. From a personal perspective, the latter point of view carries more weight given that understanding ideas and concepts could enhance students' brainstorming and information retention. Below I will strive to explain my supporting points in more detail.
The first and foremost point, teaching students ideas and concepts has a positive impact on their brain functions. A vivid example that could be given to shed light on that, students in the Northen American schools who started to understand ideas and concepts have better grades than those who learn facts. Provided that students learn by this approach, they could actively participate in a class rather than passively. TO put it in another way, students could have a chance to integrate information and explore topics instead of learning a specific curriculum; furthermore, it could amplify not only students' imagination but also creativity. Consequently, they could come up with new designs and projects, which have significant benefits on their personality.
Next, coupled with proper brain function, long-term memory is another benefit of understanding ideas and concepts. A survey conducted by Oxford University found that students learn ideas and concepts that could recall information easier than those who learn facts, which increases students' desire to learn and promote potential learning outcomes. In other words, sharing ideas and discussing new concepts accelerate learning and boost retention. Therefore, teaching students ideas and concepts help students to learn quicker.
Taking everything into consideration; without a doubt, understanding ideas and concepts could not only augment students' thinking, but also foster their long-term memory. It is suggested that a school curriculum is redesigned to ensure that this approach is used.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-11 | meet96300 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | Vivian Chang | 80 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-04 | nph | 60 | view |
- do you agree or disagree, people should not spend lots od money on pets? 80
- tpo 30 76
- living beside our extended family was more important in the past than it is today? agree or disagree 76
- technology has made children less creative than they were in the past 80
- in the past, it was easier to identify a career that leads to a secure and successful future. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 602, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... furthermore, it could amplify not only students imagination but also creativity. Conseq...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to ensure that this approach is used.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, so, then, therefore, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 52.1666666667 63% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63141025641 4.8611393121 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84352500447 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4872778228 48.9658058833 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.133333333 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.506729011536 0.236089414692 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15750019512 0.076458572812 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119226396596 0.0737576698707 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290784001963 0.150856017488 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100330758066 0.0645574589148 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 10.9000537634 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 86.8835125448 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.