magine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? Interrupt and correct the mistake right away, Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader, Say nothing
In my opinion, the best way to deal with such a situation is by waiting until the event is over, then talking to the teacher or leader after all the people are gone. I feel this way for many reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, discussing the topic with the lecturer while no one is around will increase the chances for a positive outcome. This is mainly due to the fact that when everyone is gone, we will have a quite environment to exchange ideas without distraction or interruption. In addition, we will both feel comfortable expressing our thoughts. Moreover, if the teacher's stance was wrong, there would be less embarrassment for both of us. My own experience is a compelling example on what I mean. When I was in high school, I used to take private English language lessons with couple of friends. On one of the sessions, our tutor gave us the wrong pronunciation for a word. At first, I was not quite sure what to do as I knew that was not the right way to say it as I was just looking at the same word in a well-known dictionary a couple of days ago. Therefore, I decided to be patient and waited until all my friends went home then I talked to my tutor about this mistake. Furthermore, we checked the dictionary together to verify the correct vowels. After that, my teacher was convinced about the more natural way to pronounce this word. This example demonstrates the benefits of discussing controversial matters privately with instructors.
Secondly, interrupting teachers during speeches or saying nothing is not recommended. interrupting could distract other students as the professor may have passed mentioning the topic in question, and by asking while teaching a different topic or idea, other attendees could be thrown off or they may get confused between the two points. Needless to say that staying silent and saying nothing is even worse, especially in case the tutor was incorrect. To clarify, in my previous example, if I chose not to point out to my tutor this fact, there would have been two consequences. First, I would not have been able to validate my own knowledge against that of my teacher. Further, my friends would have learnt the wrong pronunciation, which would, in turn, have affected their grades.
In summation, the most convenient way to handle such circumstances is by having a one-on-one discussion with the educator or mentor. This is becuase doing so will result in mutual understanding, less distraction for other students and no feelings of intimidation for the professor.
- Because of its remote location, only a few species of plants and animals thrived on Easter Island, and the water surrounding it contained very few fish. Nevertheless, beginning with extremely limited resources on an isolated island, the native people achi 65
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 97
- The Vinland map is important not only because it is a 15th century map of the world but also because it contains unique information about the Norse exploration of the Americas In fact the map shows a landmass southwest of Greenland in the Atlantic that is 80
- Asteroids are large space objects made of rock and ice. There are hundreds of thousands of asteroids in our solar system. Though we often hear ideas about establishing colonies of humans to live and work on our Moon or our neighboring planet, Mars, some t 80
- Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('quite') instead an adjective, or a noun ('environment') instead of another adjective.
...hat when everyone is gone, we will have a quite environment to exchange ideas without distraction o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 360, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...pressing our thoughts. Moreover, if the teachers stance was wrong, there would be less e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Interrupting
...s or saying nothing is not recommended. interrupting could distract other students as the pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 783, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d, in turn, have affected their grades. In summation, the most convenient way to...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ings of intimidation for the professor.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, after all, i feel, i mean, in addition, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 439.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85421412301 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85748911765 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535307517084 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7809382516 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8636363636 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9545454545 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101122773586 0.236089414692 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0309931358747 0.076458572812 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393111321207 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0721907648 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050618171005 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.