Schools always collect information about teachers' teaching performance and give rewards to those teachers who
perform well. Which way do you think is more useful？
1.to evaluate teachers' performance by students.
2.to evaluate teachers' performance by teachers? Why?
Use specific reasons and details to support WHY
Evaluation of teaching performance by students’ assumptions and evaluation by teachers’ perspectives have their advantages and disadvantages. In my opinion, evaluation from students is more effective than those from teachers. I feel the way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, teachers teach students in class directly so students are more familiar with their teaching’s teaching styles. In this way, teachers can be judged fairly. However, if teachers are evaluated by themselves, they may make some mistakes since they do not even meet before.
For example, at the end of the last term, our school planned to evaluate teachers’ performance by themselves. Most teachers were very passionate and excited when they first heard the news. Several days later, they started to find they were not able to give correct evaluation due to their ignorance of other teachers’ pedagogical methods. As a result, a lot of teachers complained about the improper assessment so that they were sometimes absent-minded in class. This example demonstrates how valuable familiarity-based evaluation can be.
Additionally, there are far more students than teachers at university so the evaluation from a large group is universal. If one teacher made a wrong mistake in the evaluation process, the negative result will be obvious. On the other hand, when one student did not evaluate their teacher correctly, it will not affect the whole situation too much. My older brother’s experience proves this is true. When he first arrived at school, he was unable to be adaptive to the whole brand new environment. He started to blame this to his professor and he believed his professor is not good at teaching. At the end of his semester, he gave a D to his professor. Nonetheless, his professor rewarded by his school because most other students gave him high reputations. Thus, a common and general evaluation from a large group of students is more convincing and reliable.
In conclusion, I feel strongly that evaluation which comes from students are preferable to those from teachers themselves. This is because such evaluation is based on familiarity and because this evaluation is from a big group.
- smart car 70
- Government 80
- Schools always collect information about teachers' teaching performance and give rewards to those teachers whoperform well. Which way do you think is more useful？1.to evaluate teachers' performance by students.2.to evaluate teachers' perf 76
- For success in a future job it is more important to relate well with others than to study hard in school. (A/D) 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In any society, the contributions of scientists and engineers are more important than the contributions of artists and writers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, thus, for example, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 358.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32402234637 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1780455427 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536312849162 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6094028928 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.6363636364 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 20.6045352989 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279369060705 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927094560685 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618552495896 0.0737576698707 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184696449259 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391128370868 0.0645574589148 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.