Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.

Essay topics:

Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.

Since the beginning of the time, the human being has always strived to improve their living standards and bring more convenience to their day-to-day lives.

Throughout history, the environment has played a prominent role in the world and all society. On the other hand, in our modern society transportation play a very important role too. With technology progress and development of car factories, the personal car is more available than the past. so, almost families have at least one car. With population increase, we have more people with more personal car. I believe that the government should spend more money on improving public transportation. I will explicate my point of view in 2 sentences.

First without any shadow of a doubt, one of the most important problems in our decade is environment population. The big factories, increasing the use of poison and plastic, increase  in greenhouse gas emissions are the part of the cause of the problem. In my opinion, increase personal car is one of the most important ones and I believe that people should use public transportation more often. For encouraging people to use public transportation more, the government should spend more money on buying new equipment and repairs the old one. Sweden is one of the countries with the best condition in environment pollution. The last researches showed that the transportation system in Sweden is the best one in the world.

The second reason that I would like to bring here is that if the government don’t spend money on improving public transportation. they will be old and useless and as soon as they getting old the people don’t use them anymore. if a city has a great new public transportation it can be the one option for absorbing the tourists. Because the tourists always wanted to use the cheapest transportation system and public transportation is the cheapest in the entire world. For example, France metro lines now are one of the French tourist attractions.

To make a long story short, first of all, I believe that we act irresponsibly about our environment. And now we can only compensate for future generations.

having pure air and the sea or lake without pollution is their right. From now until eternity we should try to eliminate pollution as much as possible. The first step and the easier one is using public transportation than a personal car. it’s not hard, and it’s not expensive also. so I believe it is reasonable that the government pay more money and attention to it.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-15 wty980711 73 view
2019-10-04 Orwell1984 76 view
2019-09-23 mohammadkmi 81 view
2019-09-23 mohammadkmi 76 view
2019-09-23 marysv 73 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Neshat-ygn :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...al car is more available than the past. so, almost families have at least one car....
^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &nbsp
...increasing the use of poison and plastic, increase  in greenhouse gas emissi...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 136, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ney on improving public transportation. they will be old and useless and as soon as ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 237, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...the people don't use them anymore. if a city has a great new public transport...
^^
Line 17, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...only compensate for future generations. having pure air and the sea or lake with...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Having
...mpensate for future generations. having pure air and the sea or lake without po...
^^^^^^
Line 21, column 240, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It&apos
...lic transportation than a personal car. it's not hard, and it's not expensive...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 288, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...s not hard, and it's not expensive also. so I believe it is reasonable that the...
^^^^
Line 21, column 294, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...hard, and it's not expensive also. so I believe it is reasonable that the gov...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, at least, for example, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2131.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07380952381 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17767420902 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483333333333 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 653.4 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5905058391 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9615384615 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1538461538 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76923076923 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296961996206 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839882335124 0.076458572812 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131357143697 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139485769173 0.150856017488 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0770561127174 0.0645574589148 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.