Some people believe that the Earth is being harm damaged by human activity Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live What is your opinion Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Some people believe that the Earth is being harm (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Earth has natural resources that people uses for living. Because of this reason, people transfer green area and resources to beneficial purpose. In my opinion, I feel that human activities is the main reasons that earth is being damaged.

Human is an intelligent and selfish species. Long time ago, human has learned to apply natural resources to build an equipment. Our descendant invested a weapon from wood and stone and foraged animals for living. Unluckily, human doesn't know the word "enough". They also cut tree and build a shelter for themselves. Nowadays, human population is more than other species. For living purpose, we destroys a large area of forest and consume natural resources unstoppably. As a result, the supply chain of natural resources will gone from our own hands.

There is no official restriction to control human activity. Since human populated the world, we destroy forest and green area for civil development. The expansion rate is increasing every year because there is no space for everybody in a city. As a result, suburban area is developed to become a new city center where occupy by human. The kind of unstop activity causes the subsequence problems such as species extinction to air pollution. For example, when the forest has been destroyed, animal has no food resources and place to stay. Which means they have to adapt for living or die. If the government has no control over the issue, natural resources will be gone forever.

All in all, human activity destroys earth. We do it because of our living purpose without stop and think about the loss of the others. That is why civil development transforms green space to concrete jungle. Moreover, the government should take restrict control to preserve green space for our next generation to see.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-25 sonyeoso 80 view
2022-04-07 henrytsui 76 view
2021-08-17 nusybah 80 view
2021-01-21 Stiliyan 90 view
2020-10-09 Saara 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user tanauch17 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'equipment'.
Suggestion: equipment
...ned to apply natural resources to build an equipment. Our descendant invested a weapon from ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ed animals for living. Unluckily, human doesnt know the word 'enough'. They ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'destroy'
Suggestion: destroy
...n other species. For living purpose, we destroys a large area of forest and consume natu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[3]
Message: Did you mean 'go' or 'be gone'?
Suggestion: go; be gone
... supply chain of natural resources will gone from our own hands. There is no offi...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, for example, i feel, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 297.0 407.700716846 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07407407407 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69534034861 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579124579125 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.9606418026 48.9658058833 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.5217391304 100.406767564 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.9130434783 20.6045352989 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86956521739 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194770973381 0.236089414692 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634961886046 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836570868421 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145116920538 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920615198463 0.0645574589148 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 58.1214874552 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 10.002688172 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.