Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Our planet is the important part of our existence. Without earth, there is no life. Even though environmentalists, geologists and others do a lot of studies and researches, many issues still have no answers. Some people feel that human activity is damaging our precious planet. Others disagree. In my view, I agree that people activity has harmed the Earth more than it has helped for two important reason.
First, is pollution. For the last two decades, many reports give has been showed that human activities cause pollution wherever in land or water in addition to disturb our ecosystem. For example, when someone plans to build a new manufacture, despite of current laws requirements, states that building manufacture should be outside of inner city. It won’t solve the main cause of pollution comes from waste products of these manufactures. That affect not only the humans but also animals and plants. Another case, there are some evidences support that soil and water pollution result from spilling of oil fields. this spills will have serious drawbacks like toxin lands and of course pollutes groundwater without forgetting oceans. As a result, many different types of agricultures will die, and we will lose our livestock. So, this will disturb our ecosystem, if not already has happened. As you can see, the earth is damaged by human activities. Governments should do more restricted on these negative activities to save the Earth from pollution.
Second, Global climate change caused by human activity destroys many people’s lives. Changing in temperatures and changing weather patterns, will be definitely have negative impact on people. For instance, recently, a hurricane called Mathew hit Florida state. Unfortunately, this hurricane caused many people died, many of them lost their homes, jobs, and other public properties have been completely destroyed. This catastrophe wasn’t a coincidence it happened as a result of people activity during many years. According to experts, all of that happened because of peoples’ negative activities that on the Earth such as air pollution from industries, and from cars exhaust that emit different gases, which affects our atmosphere in a negative way. We should consider thoroughly what happened in Florida, could be at any other place, no matter where a city is located at a coast or far away. People activities should be limited and controlled. Governments should do much more to avoid any catastrophe again. that incidence learned me that how people negative activities have done could cause to our universe.
In sum, our Earth harmed by our activity that indeed have drawbacks like pollutions for soil and water. In addition to changing Global climate which caused catastrophes to our lives.
Although, people always care about making wealth and expand their businesses. Governments should concern about how to improve their industrial qualities, we should all work to limit our negative impact.
- TPO-07 - Integrated Writing Task In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices, an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recyclin 80
- TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama 76
- TPO-03 - Integrated Writing Task Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rem 60
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 80
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause pollution wherever in land or water in addition to disturb our ecosystem. Fo...
^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...facture should be outside of inner city. It won't solve the main cause of po...
^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ion result from spilling of oil fields. this spills will have serious drawbacks like...
^^^^
Line 3, column 753, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...without forgetting oceans. As a result, many different types of agricultures will die, and we ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 747, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ent gases, which affects our atmosphere in a negative way. We should consider thoroughly what hap...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1025, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...ch more to avoid any catastrophe again. that incidence learned me that how people ne...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, still, for example, for instance, in addition, of course, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2524.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39316239316 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83832436094 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 783.9 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4058411897 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0344827586 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1379310345 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27586206897 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 21.0 3.85842293907 544% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198437173332 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060097615685 0.076458572812 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063329867343 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113895405672 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640247137215 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 86.8835125448 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Try to use less pronouns (like 'It, I, They, We, You...') as the subject of a sentence.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.