Some people like to travel with a companion. Other people prefer to travel alone. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.
There are myriad ways people can go travelling and each provides various benefits. Personally, I prefer travelling with my family or with my friends over visiting some place alone. I feel this way for several reasons which I will explore in my subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, by going on a trip with a companion, you would go to places that you wouldn’t have gone if you were by yourself. In addition, you will be able to explore new fields that you’ve never imagined and that stimuli might spark interest after you experience something new. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I went to visit Kyoto with my friend, I wanted to see Kyoto’s urban cities but my friend wanted to visit temples. Although I didn’t have interest in cultural aspects, since it was my friend’s desire to visit temples, we decided to go to both places. As a result, after I examined the architecture and learned about Kyoto’s histories in shrines, I got drawn into shrines. This fresh and stimulative experience led me to study about Japanese architecture in my high school selective course. If it wasn’t for my friend’s suggestion, I wouldn’t have decided to focus on architecture and anthropology.
Secondly, when going abroad or to any place that you are not familiar with, it would be more safe and comfortable if you had someone close on your trip. For instance, there might be technical issues with your phone, you might get sick, and other unexpected troubles might arise that are hard to overcome if you are solitary. Drawing from my experience, about a year ago, when I visited Melbourne for the first time with my friends, I catched a cold. My friends supported me at the hotel by calling the tour guide, asking the hotel staff, and buying me medines at the local supermarket. If it weren’t for my friends, I would have been stuck in bed, struggling to obtain contacts and resources to relieve my fever.
In conclusion, I firmly argue that travelling with a companion is better than travelling alone. This is because you might evoke interest in an area you’ve never thought of from visiting an unfamiliar place, and because you would be able to deal with difficult situations more patiently and smoothly by having someone trustworthy and reliable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-09 | joyce05 | 87 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | ujjwalsatyam 9211 | 70 | view |
| 2021-06-25 | ursula | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-17 | small | 70 | view |
| 2021-02-25 | edsonsimoes | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Our current way of life will have a negative impact on future generations 78
- The administrators of a university are revising their budget and have decided to change their funding priorities As a result the university will now spend more money on sports and athletic facilities than they do on the campus libraries Do you think this 73
- Some people like to travel with a companion Other people prefer to travel alone Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice 78
- Agree or disagree It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to use printed materials such as books and articles to do research than it is to use the internet Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 933, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...focus on architecture and anthropology. Secondly, when going abroad or to any pl...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90697674419 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77073923476 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552971576227 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4107002087 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184258220572 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619668106666 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633288989934 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133139243901 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619832180104 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.