Some students prefer to study and do homework alone. Others prefer to study and work on class assignments with a group of fellow students. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Studying for exams might be one of the toughest experiences, which require a lot of preparation away from distractions. Personally, I believe that studying alone is better than studying with a group. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, studying alone would minimize distractions. People who tend to study and work alone can focus more than people who work in groups or public places. Working or studying with large or even small groups could be wasting of time. My own experience is a compelling example of this. In my third year in a university, I attended group study sessions to prepare for the Fluid mechanics' exam. During the session, all students were joking around and spending the entire time gossiping and talking. Eventually, I left the group without accomplishing anything. As a result, I performed worse on the test than I would have if I had just studied alone.
Furthermore, studying alone allows individuals to use study tactics that are most suitable for them. Moreover, students who usually study alone are more able to figure out their weak points, so they can focus and work harder on exactly what they need to learn. For instance, in the group study, I mentioned previously, I could not notice that I was fragile in the Bernoulli equation topic, because I did not practice more. Unfortunately, the exam had many questions on this specific topic, and I could not answer any questions.
In conclusion, I believe that the advantages of studying alone outweigh the ones of the group studying. This is because students can focus on the topics that they need to away from any distractions.
- How ancient Egyptians were able to bring rocks and other building materials to construction sites has been gaining evidence But the question of how they lifted massive rocks to build the pyramid is still unsolved leaving rooms for theories to be suggested 73
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 83
- In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States—birds in particular. Unfortunately for birds, these trends are likely t 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- A little over 2,200 years ago, the Roman navy attacked the Greek port city of Syracuse. According to some ancient historians, the Greeks defended themselves with an ingenious weapon called a “burning mirror”: a polished copper surface curved to focus 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, third, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 283.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94346289753 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75207630881 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 212.727598566 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56890459364 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 618.680645161 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6062978431 48.9658058833 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2941176471 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6470588235 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24118767329 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820126088623 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051578924995 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153859517961 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262153347431 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.