for a success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.
Nowadays, job seekers in order to earn a living encounter different obstacles to find a suitable job. Since having a job requires various factors, human beings always try to learn many skills and absorb knowledge to enhance their chance of hiring in a company. I strongly believe that studying hard in school is more important than having the ability to interact well with people. This is a result of the fact that studying hard brings us an academic degree and help us to learn specialized course. Following paragraphs comprehensively explain the reasons.
First and foremost, studying hard gives us the opportunity to acquire academic degree containing a lot of good grades. These days, companies are looking for a person who has a strong academic background. Because companies consider the fact that if a person is able to deal with such hard exams, he would definitely handle the company's tasks. My own unforgettable experience is a compelling example. When a look at past, memories come flooding back, I distinctly remember that after graduating from university, my nephew and I have applied for a firm then the firm invited us for cooperation. Because of having a great academic degree, the firm offered my nephew a job with a more competitive salary and generous benefits. However, they just offered me a low-level and temporary job that I had to work overtime in order to make more money. Had I had a great academic degree like my nephew's, I would have a full-time job or even a demanding job.
Secondly, studying hard provides us with an acquaintance with specialized lessons that helps us to find a proper job, resulting in a prosperous person in our future career. Since the advent of the technologies, many companies have tried to become updated. Because they are aware that if they want to remain in the selling competition they have to progress, furthermore, they have to meet their customer needs. As a result, this goal is not possible until they take specialized employees. Having the ability to create interaction between people may cover a part of the story but it is not sufficient for dramatic improvement of the company. A specialized employee, who has a wide range of determined information, help the company in harsh situations. For instance, two years ago, a computer company was faced with some problem pertaining to selling department, since they wanted to seek customer on the internet, but they did not have a specialized person to accomplish this task. Consequently, they made a bid decision to hire a person who was capable of doing tasks related to language programming. My brother was a hard-working student in the university and he has passed the language programming as well, so he was hired in that company immediately. This example illustrates the importance of studying hard to find a proper job as easily as possible.
In conclusion, although many factors are significant in job finding, by weighing the possible outcomes, I am on the opinion that that studying hard is the most important part which contributes to success in the future career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | DHANDA | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | naziii | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | sarah halawani | 65 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | liviapabreu | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Somayya | 76 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2577.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 516.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99418604651 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92627894039 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517441860465 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8142578688 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.375 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70833333333 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285059235997 0.236089414692 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0734260608047 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882445223143 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183408431677 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506842185626 0.0645574589148 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 86.8835125448 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.