TOP38
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The issue of whether leadership is intrinsic characteristic and people could not learn it by themselves aroused much controversy among people of different ages and different perspectives. Definitely, some people if were asked would agree with the statement that leadership comes naturally which means one cannot learn to be a leader, while others have a negative attitude toward this point of view. As far as I am concerned, I am in agreement with the latter group. In the following paragraph, I will shed light on the arguments to support my view.
The first vital point to be mentioned is that as leadership, people should possess some valuable skills which can be learned by education. Some skills like how to manage some tough situation, how to communicate with group members, and make a wise decision on time. All of these skills mentioned could be learned by practicing. If you want to manage difficulties you can learn it through experiencing many hardships during your work as a leader or by studying book about others experiences, the communication skills can improve over time by interacting with many people, as time goes, you learn what the best decision is in every situation. As you see, none of these important features of leadership are innate abilities. Therefore, without any doubt, we can claim the leadership is not intrinsic.
In approaching this issue apart from the reason given above, another reason that deserves some words is that there are many cases that were shy or even the introvert people and one specific event change their life to choose as a leader and many of them confess they learn this ability over time. To shed light on this issue, take Mirza Kuchak Chan as a real example. I had read the biography of Mirza Kuchak Chan, he was a leader of the revolution that happens in my country in the 19th century. He was a reticent and introverted child who could not connect with his peers. Nevertheless, as he grew up, he gained confidence and social skills. Due to his friend trusts him, they choose him as the leader. Finally, he became the leader of one of the important events in our history. As a result, if he was born as leadership, he must not the problem of many skills related to leadership.
By the way of conclusion, based on the arguments explored above, I am of the opinion that leadership is not natural ability because some prominent skills that every leader needs to can be learned by training and experiencing. Moreover, there many examples of brilliant leaderships in history who were not born as a leader and became a leader over time.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct 73
- TOP38Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In today s world it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO 38 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Leadership comes naturally one cannot learn to be a leader Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 88
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, apart from, as a result, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80941704036 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73100153093 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506726457399 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.6643079662 48.9658058833 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276205084398 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726358911727 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057063753237 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163124887031 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414065027351 0.0645574589148 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.