TPO-02 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
No one denies the importance of honesty. Whether telling the truth or not, is a controversial debate among people these days. Although many people believe that sometimes lying is necessary in relationships, in my opinion, always telling the truth is the best way to keep our relationships in any case. In the following passage, I clarify why I agree with the mentioned statement.
Trust is the root of any professional relationship. It is absolutely necessary in order to establish not only your reputation, but also a strong network of people who will help you throughout your life. Relationships undoubtedly are based on trust. If we want to keep our relationships, we should be truthful man. Conversely, distrust leads to the destruction of relationship. In fact liar people lose their friend’s trust. Secrets and lies jeopardize trust and can damage our relationships. Lie and truth cannot easily coexist; eventually the former will destroy the latter. For instance, one of my friends lied to her husband about her former relation before marriage; as her husband found out, the problems started in their life that would not have been occurred if she had told him before. Telling a lie caused her life to end up with divorce. Consequently, telling the truth is the main part in a relationship. As a result telling truth is not only beneficial for the person who is telling the truth, but also for the person who is told the truth.
Additionally, honesty can improve people health condition. Health is a state of complete physical, mental, social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. From the perspective of physiologists, dishonesty has negative influence in people well-being. Many claims, books, articles in the whole world, independently, believe that health condition depends to honesty directly. As a case in point, a joint study between Harvard University and University of California, Berkeley researchers that they claim dishonesty will destroy people health. They have proven their claim scientifically with the help of simulation by mathematical equations. According to their article, on one hand, telling the truth, being altruistic, acting fairly and being generally other oriented are virtues directly linked to a suite of positive health outcomes such as: better health and physical wellness, lower stress, decreased cellular aging, increased psychological well-being and longevity of life. On the other hand, lying, being selfish, cheating, and engaging in infidelity are associated with a suite of negative health outcomes such as elevated heart rate, increased blood pressure.
In conclusion, honesty has positive affection in both relationship and health condition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | M. MEHRABI KERMANI | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-05 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | sonyeoso | 78 | view |
- tpo1 3
- TPO-02 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statementIn twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than today. 76
- saving money or traveling? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...of any professional relationship. It is absolutely necessary in order to establish not only your rep...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ectly. As a case in point, a joint study between Harvard University and Univers...
^^
Line 4, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in point, a joint study between Harvard University and University of Californi...
^^
Line 4, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t study between Harvard University and University of California, Berkeley res...
^^
Line 4, column 477, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n Harvard University and University of California, Berkeley researchers that ...
^^
Line 4, column 499, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and University of California, Berkeley researchers that they claim dishonesty ...
^^
Line 4, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ty of California, Berkeley researchers that they claim dishonesty will destroy ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in any case, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39671361502 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06259231137 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56103286385 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 67.2367042619 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.96 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.04 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.24 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162358119216 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482486509659 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472971960863 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102775056125 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721283291532 0.0645574589148 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 86.8835125448 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.