Tpo22
Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
Without shadow of doubt I think teachers beside the parents grow up the student and have great influence in their lives. some people assert that, teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. According to my own experience and actual observation of life have led me to be agree with this issue. I delve into many reason to substantiate my point.
The first and possible the paramount consequential reason is this, all the people have own experiences at life and they always want to speak about their knowledge and own experiences about political and society problems. When the teacher talking about their bad experiences about society or political problem that would make some wrong attitude in student’s mind toward government and society. this attitude can cause some serious problem in the future. teachers maybe change student’s attitude toward government and society peoples and cause that student can’t create good relationship with their society and government.
Another point that springing to mind is that, teachers always in student’s mind is trustable person that always say right thing and parent say to their student that listen carefully listen to their teachers advises and ask them for help in different situation, but teachers maybe experience some bad situation and transfer it to the student. parent don’t want their student disturb their mind with political problems and they trusted the teachers but if teachers don’t consider this issue, they can provide some problems between them. And your view about political problem is your attitude and we must avoid transfer it to the student and disturb their mind.
To sum it up by taking all the detail into consideration all the teachers should not explain their attitude toward political and social problems in the classroom and don’t disturb students mind with this problem at the early age of their life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...nd have great influence in their lives. some people assert that, teachers should not...
^^^^
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'many reasons'.
Suggestion: many reasons
... be agree with this issue. I delve into many reason to substantiate my point. The first ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...s;s mind toward government and society. this attitude can cause some serious problem...
^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Teachers
...use some serious problem in the future. teachers maybe change student's attitude to...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 348, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Parent
...tuation and transfer it to the student. parent don't want their student disturb t...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...problem at the early age of their life.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, i think, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 312.0 407.700716846 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29807692308 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64936564362 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471153846154 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.9 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.9980709647 48.9658058833 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.75 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303537229677 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139667954865 0.076458572812 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162508081983 0.0737576698707 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218364591412 0.150856017488 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696796322553 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 86.8835125448 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.