work in a team or alone
Nowadays, we are living in a very competitive world and we are requested to find solutions for problems in diverse situations. There are people who hold the opinion that working with different kind of persons boost intellectual skills and broaden our view to troubleshooting while others prefer to work alone. Personally, I believe that working in a team might be more beneficial. I feel this way for several reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, working with colleagues might reduce time of troubleshooting. In other words, working in a team increases collaboration and brainstorming and those allow us to solve problems in less time. An example of mine may illustrate that. I was working in a petroleum company and I was required to find a solution for the defect in a gas pipe. I spent 2 weeks and my efforts were not enough. Then I said to my manager that I needed help from my colleagues. When we started to work together, their different thoughts and views helped me to solve the problem in 3 days. As you can see, working in a team offer us more ideas and as a result productivity might tends to improve.
Secondly, team work enable us to find our strengths and weaknesses and even of our fellows. This these qualities are very important in corporative world once it gives us a comfortable way to accomplish our goals. When I was in high school, I used to play volleyball. In this period I was the captain of the team, and I had to learn how to identify my own strengths and weaknesses and also from my peers in order to win the games. Playing in a team sport helped me prepare for this valuable skill I would need later in life.
To sum it up, work with diverse kinds of persons might be a good way to succeed in personal life and also in business world. It can be essential to solve problems in a record time and also teaches us how to detect qualities that may be essential in a business world.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 70
- Genetic modification 80
- eco-certification 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for students to understand ideas and concepts than it is for them to learn facts. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd I had to learn how to identify my own strengths and weaknesses and also from m...
^^
Line 11, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a record time and also teaches us how to detect qualities that may be essential i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, i feel, kind of, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 353.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52974504249 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75130185593 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521246458924 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6436123565 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1578947368 100.406767564 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5789473684 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24665613245 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792389071399 0.076458572812 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0836538978269 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153246657006 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695864241863 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 11.7677419355 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 86.8835125448 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.