In the 1950s Torreya Taxifolia, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Experts are considering three ways to address the decline of Torreya.
The first option is to reestablish Torreya in the same location in which it thrived for thousands of years. Torreya used to be found in abundance in the northern part of Florida, which has a specific microclimate. A microclimate exists when weather conditions inside a relatively small area differs from the region of which that area is a part. Northern Florida’s microclimate is very favorable to Torreya’s growth. This microclimate is wetter and cooler than the surrounding region’s relatively dry, warm climate. been working plant Torreya seeds in the coolest, dampest areas of the microclimate.
The second option is to move Torreya to an entirely different location, far from its Florida microclimate. Torrey seeds and saplings have been successfully plated and growth in forests further north, where the temperature is significantly cooler. Some scientists believe that Torreya probably thrived in areas much further north in the distant past, so by relocating it now, in a process known as assisted migration, humans would simply be helping Torreya return to an environment that is more suited to its survival.
The third option is to preserve Torreya in research centers. Seeds and saplings can be moved from the wild and preserved in a closely monitored environment where it will be easier for scientists both to protect the species and conduct research on Torreya. This research can then be used to ensure the continued survival of the species
Both the reading passage and listening discuss whether the Torreya taxifolia will decline soon or not. The former argues that this practise has three significant ways to address but the latter contradicts each of these points.
First, the article claims that reestablishing Torreya in the same location will be beneficial as it has be thrived from thousands of years. Furthermore, it is stated that Torreya used to be found in abundance in northern part of Florida which has a specific microclimate which exist when weather condition inside a small area differ from that the region oh that area. In northern Florida the microclimate is wetter and coolor than surrounding dry area so scientist are working to plant in coolest area. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer.He claims that it will not get successful due to change of climate in large region is not notable. Additionally, he points out that due to global waming and wet areas getting drier it will be very difficult to convey.
Second, the writer asserts that moving Torreya to an entirely different location far from microclimate of Florida. On top of that, author adds that Torreya seeds and saplings have been successful in forests further north where temperature is cooler so thriving by relocating it not in process assisted migration humans can return Torreya to more suitable environment. However, the professor rebuts that by doing this plant can be in more danger like shifting from North to new environment can spread them quickly or even can kill themselves as well as other plants can be in danger. Further, he remarks that it will be very unpredictable and can become extinct.
Finally, the text contends that by preserving Torreya in research centers where they can be closely monitored and can be easier to protect the specied. Moreover, it is highlighted that this research can even be used to continue the survival of the species. On the other hand, the speaker argues that it can become worst as genetic diverse which can be very large. In Addition to that plant can also stop to survive due to disease getting them.
As you can see from above, the author and lecturer hold very different views on the topic Torreya taxifolia a type of evergreen tree in Florida who is starting to die out and so different ways to address them for saving it.
- professor appearance of television 80
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 75
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 75
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities Recently we signed a contract with the Fly Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our warehouse i 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...e location will be beneficial as it has be thrived from thousands of years. Furthe...
^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the coolest'.
Suggestion: in the coolest
... area so scientist are working to plant in coolest area. This specific argument is challen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
... argument is challenged by the lecturer.He claims that it will not get successful ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, well, in addition, as well as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1373.03311258 142% => OK
No of words: 396.0 270.72406181 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92676767677 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63230050883 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 145.348785872 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 419.366225166 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.218557325 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.9375 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16560382901 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617608805625 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601136283928 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108589410176 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544104458843 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 63.6247240618 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...e location will be beneficial as it has be thrived from thousands of years. Furthe...
^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the coolest'.
Suggestion: in the coolest
... area so scientist are working to plant in coolest area. This specific argument is challen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 557, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
... argument is challenged by the lecturer.He claims that it will not get successful ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, well, in addition, as well as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 30.3222958057 171% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1373.03311258 142% => OK
No of words: 396.0 270.72406181 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92676767677 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63230050883 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 145.348785872 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 419.366225166 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.218557325 49.2860985944 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.9375 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16560382901 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617608805625 0.0996497079465 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601136283928 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108589410176 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544104458843 0.0443174109184 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 63.6247240618 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.