The professor refused the idea in the reading material that R. robustus was an inactive hunter. According to the article, R. robustus had the remains of psittacosaur thus this dinosaur was considered by scavenger. However, she pointed out that they could be a hunter with three points below.
First, R. robustus is such a small dinosaur compared to one found in their stomach. The speaker stated that it is possible that R. robustus ate them before they hatched so that the size of baby or egg are still small to be eaten.
Second, it is about size of legs they had. The reading pointed that psittacosaur is way faster than R. robustus because of their long legs. Compared to this idea, the talker told that if they were unmature animals, they do not run as fast as their parents so it is possible to catch babies.
Lastly, the professor showed her opinion about absent of teeth mark on the bones of the one were eaten. Referring to the reading material, it says that R.robustus swallowed an egg inside the eggshell however the lady thought R. robustus is know as animal use jews to hold. Also, they usually use back teeth to chew so it is not necessary that the bones have marks on.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for people to move out of their hometowns when they become adults, instead of staying in their home communities for their whole lives. 70
- Your teacher has given you a large assignment that must be completed in one month. You can complete the assignment gradually by working on it a little bit each day, or you can complete the work quickly by working on it intensively for three or four days. 60
- TPO-05 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do.Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 60
- INtegrated essay from official guide to toefl test ETS. "Appearance of professors on television" 80
- TPO-26 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.Use specific r 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The professor refused the idea in the re...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be a hunter with three points below. First, R. robustus is such a small dinos...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or egg are still small to be eaten. Second, it is about size of legs they ha...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s so it is possible to catch babies. Lastly, the professor showed her opinion...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...however the lady thought R. robustus is know as animal use jews to hold. Also, they ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, second, so, still, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 982.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6103286385 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33851834144 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 145.348785872 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572769953052 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2233555581 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 61.375 110.228320801 56% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.3125 21.698381199 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5625 7.06452816374 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.27373068433 374% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140349001219 0.272083759551 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466901645186 0.0996497079465 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563593602643 0.0662205650399 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0879766024094 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0305227342896 0.0443174109184 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.9 13.3589403974 52% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 53.8541721854 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 11.0289183223 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.57 12.2367328918 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 63.6247240618 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 10.7273730684 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.