bees fossils found in the Arizona
The reading and lecture are both about whether bees were existed before two hundred years ago or not based on evidence about nest like structure which were found in Arizona. The author of reading is skeptics about the presence of bees at that time. However, the lecturer thinks that there is possibility that, that structure made by bees.
First of all, the author believes that no bee's fossils were found which more than hundred years old are. This point is challenged by lecturer. He says that bees made nest on trees which trees produce sticky fluid. Furthermore, he points out at that time probably bees could not find that facilities and trees could not produce that type of resin, so there were no fossils of bees.
Secondly, the author claims that, before 125 million years ago no presence of flower plants, whereas bees need flowers to feed. The lecturer rebuts this claim and suggests that non flower plants were present at that time so bees feed on the pines and fern trees. He elaborates on this by mentioning that after few years when flower plants were came they started to adapt that habit.
Finally, the author mentions that there was a lack of caps in nests. He is of the opinion that it was made by some another insects. The lecturer, on the other hand, states that honey bees use the waterproof material to protect their nests. He puts the forth that there was evidence that at that time bees had chemical material to save their nests.
In conclusion, the lecturer effectively casts doubt on the claims made by author in reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and lecture are both about w...
^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...bees fossils were found which more than hundred years old are. This point is challenged...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, so there were no fossils of bees. Secondly, the author claims that, before...
^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...after few years when flower plants were came they started to adapt that habit. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me they started to adapt that habit. Finally, the author mentions that there ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, whereas, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 12.0772626932 199% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16211481759 2.5805825403 84% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507352941176 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6850862825 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1333333333 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233862000975 0.272083759551 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679428653753 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732322640943 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106749312161 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816226342525 0.0443174109184 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.3589403974 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 63.6247240618 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.