Carved stone balls
The reading and the lecturer are both about a carved stone ball from the late Neolithic period. The author of the reading feels that they were carved from so many kinds of stone which most of them were 70 diameters for many usages. The lecturer challenged the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that these reasons are not convincing.
To begin with, the reading states that carved stone balls were carved as a weapon for hunting or struggling. The article mentions that they have a hole in them which allows the person who takes it to swing it around on throwing it. This specific claim is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that they were just a sign of wear. Additionally, he says that many of them were broken off or damaged and those holes were not for the hunter to use it.
Secondly, the author of the reading argues that those carved stone balls were the port of primitive systems of weights and measures. The reading mentions that they shaped in 70 mm in diameter which suggests that the balls were not interchangeable and represented some standard unit of measure. The lecturer, however, rebuts on this by mentioning that carved stone balls were constructed from different types of stone like a green stone. He elaborates on this by bringing up the point that those stones have a different density which makes the carved stone balls exclusive for themselves.
Finally, the author of the reading posits that carved stone balls served for social purposes as opposed to a practical or utilitarian one. Moreover, it is stated in the article that many stone balls elaborate designs. The lecturer, in contrast, has a different position than carved stone balls intricated and was too simple. He notes that those carved stone balls were buried with their position.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-31 | reza_fattahi | 83 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 85 | view |
| 2022-12-25 | nikki07hung | 85 | view |
| 2022-12-02 | lilipo | 80 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | _sta | 80 | view |
- How can humans maintain Venus 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays. 73
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do? 1. Interrupt and correct the mistake right away; 2. Wait until the class or the 70
- TPO 48 73
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...them were 70 diameters for many usages. The lecturer challenged the claims made by ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, as to, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 22.412803532 183% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80519480519 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44520615535 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474025974026 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6829679607 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0588235294 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41176470588 7.06452816374 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.531792301092 0.272083759551 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218227324069 0.0996497079465 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18827904425 0.0662205650399 284% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.396732885408 0.162205337803 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169358109479 0.0443174109184 382% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.