dams
The reading and the lecture both are about dams. The author of the reading believes that dams are appropriate creation source of electricity nowadays, and he present three reasons to prove his assertion. This argument is challenged by the lecture. He is of the opinion that none of these claims is correct.
First, the author alleges that the dams don’t have any impact on the environment, even, have positive effect on it. it is mentioned that, lakes created behind the dams provide a good habitat for fish and create an entertainment area for local people. But the lecturer argues that dams form many remarkable problems during and after the construction. He says when a dam is build, the direction of water should be changed to allow workers to work. So it causes migration fish die. Furthermore, after the construction, velocity of water is decreased so that fish can not lay their eggs.
Secondly, the writer contends that the power produced by dams is almost the same amount as the coal plants generate while producing electricity in this way don’t release global gas into the air. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by asserting that, the lands surrounding dams permanently are flooded so that the plants within plain are destroyed. As a result, the rotten plants release the netrotin that is one of the global warming gas.
Finally, it is stated in the article that, dams don’t create financial problem for the community. The article notes, incomes is made by existence of dams per year is more than operating cost. So it also, has benefits for the local citizen. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits this by mentioning that building a dam isn’t possible without government aid. In addition, flood plain that was the land, local people live there should be relocated. Therefor, these expenses are taken as a tax from local people, so it is as burden on local shoulder.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | Yash Mehta | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2022-09-22 | m_aalaei | 76 | view |
| 2022-07-23 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 75 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople. But the lecturer argues that dams form many remarkable problems during and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 320.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.978125 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62163288513 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5640213049 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8421052632 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8421052632 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346100837012 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987308637226 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955192745418 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203310349373 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619278054637 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.