how technological advance affect employee?

Essay topics:

how technological advance affect employee?

The lecture and passage are about how technological advances affect employee`s health and efficiency of work at the office. According to the passage, side effects followed by the new technological invention are diagnosing a lot these days, including back pain, stress, and inefficiency. However, the speaker mainly discusses the importance of such inventions, such as e-mail, multi-task printer, and photocopiers.
As the writer states, the more ease in office work, the more time employees spend sitting and staring at a screen. As a consequence, pressure coming to eyes and backbone are increasing which leads to further health issues and ineffectual work results. The narrator casts doubt on this topic. By implementing newly created devices which are meant to make the complicated task easier for workers, a company can get benefits, involving fewer assistant for copying and folding papers. Moreover, the need of salary for employees can be decreased in further.
In the reading, the author recommends actions to take in order to avoid health problems associated with long hours of work without movement. Walking for at least 5 minutes per hour, arranging meetings outside from office and organizing working space can not only prevent diseases but it increases workers manner of creativity. The speaker mainly talk about benefits followed by using e-mail to communicate with participants. Additionally, he consider e-mail communication as the most accessible, the cheapest and the most rapid way in contrast to other methods of interacting.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-06-13 Yanjka 80 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'considers'.
Suggestion: considers
...ate with participants. Additionally, he consider e-mail communication as the most access...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, moreover, so, at least, in contrast, such as, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 22.412803532 18% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50627615063 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01992357129 2.5805825403 117% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677824267782 0.540411800872 125% => OK
syllable_count: 399.6 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9055651303 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.06452816374 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157839181785 0.272083759551 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557956413361 0.0996497079465 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127786149046 0.0662205650399 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113547823379 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124999105697 0.0443174109184 282% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.42419426049 124% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:

para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3

Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).

Don't need a conclusion paragraph.

Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster


Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.