Jane Austen
The author of the passage believes that the recently identified portrait that has come into light is that of Jane Austen during her teenage, based on three major evidences; family's recognition, similarity in details of the painting with facial structures, and matching of its style with that of Ozias Humphrey who was the painter of the time. Surpsisingly, the lecturer seems to have been at odds with that point of view as he dismisses each of those evidences thereby weakening the claim of the author.
As a first attempt to substantiate the stand, the writer goes on to explain how Austen's extended family had given recognition as the real painting of Austen for over 100 years. However, according to the speaker. this particular explantaion is fallacious in itself since the those people who were said to have done so were 70 years younger than Jane Austen and thus they could have in no way recognized her real face as a teenager. This shows no validity of the evidence.
Moving further, the orator goes on to condemn the second evidence described by the author as connection of the details of the painting to Austen's facial features. The speaker brings light into the fact that the mere similarity in some facial forms need not necessarily have to be that of Jane Austen since her cousins too looked similar during their teenage. It could be of any of her relative and thus there is no strong proof of it.
Now, if these contentions were not enough to dismiss the claim of the essayist already, the speaker goes on to disclose the fallacy of the author's third piece of proof, as the ultimate attempt. For the explanation that the painting was of similar style as that of Ozias Humphrey which should mean it was of Austen's painting, the orator reveals that the presence of real evidence such as stamp as the back of the picture dated the time when Austen would be in late 20s. This establishes the claim of the speaker that the portrait could have in no way be of a teenage Austen.
It is in this manner that by disclosing the fallacy in each of the evidence, that the orator casts doubt on the claims made by the author that the portait was that of teenage Jane Austen.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-25 | fmichela | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-27 | Yam Kumar Oli | 65 | view |
| 2023-03-13 | Anurag96 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | stupidfella | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-17 | Prabesh Dhakal | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ars. However, according to the speaker. this particular explantaion is fallacious in...
^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: OF_ANY_OF[1]
Message: Consider simply using 'of' instead.
Suggestion: of
...milar during their teenage. It could be of any of her relative and thus there is no stron...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, so, third, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 30.3222958057 218% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 387.0 270.72406181 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6511627907 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4430783231 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488372093023 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 556.2 419.366225166 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.6644612923 49.2860985944 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.461538462 110.228320801 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7692307692 21.698381199 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302624308972 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102890251917 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878370868362 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192316456853 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486388422414 0.0443174109184 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 11.0289183223 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.