sending humans to mars
The article presents potential challenges on the way of sending humans to Mars. The lecturer claims that all these problems can be successfully overcome, and there are possible solutions for each one of them. Her further demonstrations are as follows.
First, although it would be an impossible burden on the cargo capacity of a spaceship to carry the food, water, and oxyen supply of a crew for that long period of time, this issue could be resolved by the use of hyrdapaunics. Hydrapaunics are plants with their roots growing in water instead of soil. These plants could be employed to produce crops as food, convert waste water absorbed by their roots to clean water vapor, and also gather up carbon dioxide and releasing oxygen like other plants do.
Secondly, while spending too much time in a zero gravity environments can have an enoromous negative on human body, there are preprations and percautions to take in order to minimise this effect. As there have already been successful attempts utilized by astronauts who have spent several months in such environments. For instance, regular exercise can soften the decrease in muscle mass, and taking minerals like calcium may reduce the impact of zero-gravity environment on the bone density.
Finally, whereas it is true that the sun can emit dangerous radiation, it only does so on few ocassions which are when the sun is particularly active, not all the time. Therefore, the application of a radiation detection device and a small low-weight shield would solve this issue. The astonauts can easily perform their daily tasks without being thretened by the radiation, and on the few times that the sensor is indicative of high radiation they can use the small shielded area to protect themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-10 | Shahjahan khandakar | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | joeyrussell007 | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-08 | safasml | 70 | view |
- When Namibia gained independence in 1990 teenager Pascolena Florry was herding goats in the country s dry desolate northern savannah Her job unpaid and dangerous was to protect her parents livestock from preying jackals and leopards She saw wildlife as th
- TPO 51 integrated elephants leave they herds when they want to die The have artistic abilities They are afraid mice 80
- international forest fund 80
- TPO 16 Integrated the archaeology science is in danger in Britain because of three reasons many artifacts were lost in construction projects many professionals feel that financial support for their research is inadequate it is difficult to have a career i 80
- The complete collapse of this civilization is still a mystery, but several theories have been put forward. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nd oxyen supply of a crew for that long period of time, this issue could be resolved by the us...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... take in order to minimise this effect. As there have already been successful atte...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07586206897 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73272326748 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 145.348785872 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641379310345 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3963944854 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0571809179078 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0280769435007 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751240620283 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0443087380745 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572722118352 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.