Summarize the lecture and the reading
Both the lecture and the reading discuss whether Rembrandt is the artist of the portrait which represents the woman's face. While the reading is doubtful about the painting, the professor endows that Rembrandt created the painting.
To begin with, the author mentions that the fur collar which the woman is wearing is not relevant to her identity. However, the professor disagrees by stating that the fur collar didn't appear in the original painting. It actually had been added a hundred years later by someone else to make a feeling of a formal woman.
Secondly, the writer makes the point that the light and shadow elements in the painting weren't fit together and Rembrandt would never have made a mistake like that. The professor opposes this viewpoint by saying that the original color of cloth was rudimentary and light. Therefore, the face would be illuminated by the reflection which looked really realistic.
Finally, the reading claims that none of Rembrandt's paintings was depicted on a panel glued together but this representation of woman's face. Nevertheless, the lecturer states that someone had beside added fur collar, he or she even enlarged the wood to make it more valuable. Initially, this painting was painted on a single wood panel which made from similar trees with other pictures.
- Summarize the lecture and the reading 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement ?The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 76
- In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their ơn money at a young age. 66
- Summarize the reading and the listening 3
- Summarize the lecture and the reading 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the lecture and the reading discuss...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that Rembrandt created the painting. To begin with, the author mentions that ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...isagrees by stating that the fur collar didnt appear in the original painting. It act...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e to make a feeling of a formal woman. Secondly, the writer makes the point tha...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
...ght and shadow elements in the painting werent fit together and Rembrandt would never ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lection which looked really realistic. Finally, the reading claims that none of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, however, look, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 214.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1214953271 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55482294348 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602803738318 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.4397926596 49.2860985944 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.6363636364 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4545454545 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109281963179 0.272083759551 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429100586207 0.0996497079465 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661490872761 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0758116628991 0.162205337803 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869626947031 0.0443174109184 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.