Summarize the points in the audio and contrast them against lecture.
The professor argues that the memoir of chevalier is fairly accurate and reliable piece of historical source about European society in the eighteen century. She provides alternative explanations against the claims made about the reliability of the memoir. She argues that the loan given by merchants to chevalier did not suggest that he was poor. As we already know that chevalier used to party and gamble often during his stay in Switzerland. This lifestyle of chevalier required considerable amount of money. However, sometimes he had to sell some assets to raise money required for his lavish lifestyle, which took some time. Hence he took loans from merchants which were to be repaid as soon as possible. She further argues that he used to write about his conversations between him and Voltaire in his journal every day. So while writing about the conversations in his memoir, these journals became the source and were reliable nature. Regarding his escape from prison, the processor suggests that there were other prisoners who had more powerful friends than chevalier but were not able to bribe their way out of the prison. Furthermore, the roof of his cell had to be repaired around the time when chevalier had supposedly escaped.
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition 66
- Summarize the points in the audio and contrast them against lecture. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 630, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...lavish lifestyle, which took some time. Hence he took loans from merchants which were...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 1373.03311258 75% => OK
No of words: 204.0 270.72406181 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06862745098 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63185539534 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622549019608 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1206160361 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 7.06452816374 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0108515700121 0.272083759551 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00585190851503 0.0996497079465 6% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0185053595664 0.0662205650399 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0108515700121 0.162205337803 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.