Summarize the points made in the leacture
The reading states that the animal R. Robustus was a scavenger rather than a hunter and it provides three reasons for it. However, the lecture disagrees with this view and refutes all the three reasons provided.
First, the article claims that R.Robustus was too small to eat some dinosaurs like Psittacosorous. The professor, however, rebuts this by saying that small size doesn't mean that Robustus couldn't eat their prey. She says that size of Robustus -although smaller than a fully grown prey-was almost twice the size of baby psittacosaur, which means it could have eaten a baby psittacosaur.
Second, the article posits that the Robustus was more suited to scavenging than hunting because of its small legs. The professor refutes this by saying that small legs are not sufficient information to claim that Robustus couldn't hunt. The professor provides the example of a modern-day hunter named Tasmanian Devil, who also has short legs like that of Robustus, but can reach a maximum speed of 50km/h. If Tasmanian devils can be a successful hunter, there is no reason why Robustus can not be.
Third, the reading says that fossils records don’t show the teeth mark of Robustus on the prey which means that the Robustus must have swallowed a psittacosaurs egg rather than eating a psittacosaur. Professor refutes this by saying that Robustus swallows its prey rather than eating it. She says that the fossil records show that the Robustus didn’t use its back teeth for eating and no teeth marks are expected on the prey eaten by Robustus.
- Summarize the points made in the leacture 3
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 41
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 58
- Some people believe that students should be given one long vacation each year. Others believe that students should have several short vacations throughout the year. Which viewpoint do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choic 73
- Some people believe that students should be given one long vacation each year. Others believe that students should have several short vacations throughout the year. Which viewpoint do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choic 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Robustus
.... First, the article claims that R.Robustus was too small to eat some dinosaurs lik...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
..., rebuts this by saying that small size doesnt mean that Robustus couldnt eat their pr...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...at small size doesnt mean that Robustus couldnt eat their prey. She says that size of R...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 223, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ient information to claim that Robustus couldnt hunt. The professor provides the exampl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 258.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09302325581 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56693344028 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523255813953 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.264000894 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.076923077 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 7.06452816374 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.