The passage indicates that despite the fact that ethanol fuel has been advocated by some people, has many critics argue that it is not good to be used instead of gasoline. The professor, however, casts some doubts on the proposed idea in the reading passage that it would actually be good and the mentioned reasons in the reading are not convincing.
According to the passage, one of the reasons that supports the theory is the major problems of the ethanol fuel is global warming. The professor, on the other hand, rejects the theory and thinks that ethanol fuel will not increase the global warming rate. He explains that growing plants, for producing ethanol fuel, will absorb the carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in their nutrition process, and this will reduce the rate of global warming.
The reading passage asserts that the production of ethanol will decrease the amount of plants and this will harm the food chain for some animals. The professor refutes this idea and indicates that ethanol fuel might be produced from cellulose, which usually comes from the non-edible parts of the plants. So it will not harm the amount of animals feeding plants.
The reading passage elaborates on the view that ethanol fuel has high price
comparing with gasoline, and it would not be as successful. The professor disagree with the idea and believes that increasing the production rate will reduce the price of production. He claims that according to a study, the prices would fall 40% if the production rate would be augmented three times more than what it is now.
- Independent writing TPO 51 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 80
- TOEFL TPO 26 - Integrated Writing Task 73
- Independent TOEFL essay - TPO 1: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 60
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92452830189 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38438613878 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483018867925 0.540411800872 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 393.3 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7947132645 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.636363636 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06452816374 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355660847216 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144704057481 0.0996497079465 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672444568301 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196813230007 0.162205337803 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498711443395 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.