TPO 24
Both the author and the lecturer discuss whether the fossil of T. rex contains remains of the actual tissues of the animal or not. While the author believes that the fossil of this animal is representative of its tissues, the lecturer disagrees with his claim, casting doubt on every single point the author made.
First of all, the author states that the breaking of the fossilized leg bone revealed small branching channels inside which are similar to the hollows in the bones where blood vessels were located. Also, they found a soft, flexible organic substance in these channels. However, the lecturer disagrees with this idea, arguing that this soft flexible substance can be something else because after an organism died, bacteria will live there, leaving organic materials which are soft and moist. Thus, it is highly unlikely that this substance represents the remains of actual blood vessels of T. rex.
Second, the author believes that the presence of reddish spheres contained iron which is a material necessary to the function of red blood cells in transporting oxygen to tissues can be the remains of red blood cells. In opposition to this, the lecturer believes that they found these reddish spheres in the organ of the primitive animals which had no blood vessels. Therefore, the presence of spheres cannot be a sign of the presence of red blood cells in such animals.
Finally, the author states that the dinosaur leg bone contained collagen which is a substance in bone tissues. On the contrary, the lecturer possesses the view that they found that collagen could last for 1000 years and it cannot find in the bone tissues of animals which were 70-million-years-old. Furthermore, he states that human skin contains collagen. Thus, it is more likely that the collagen belonged to the people who were handlers of the bones.
- TPO 28 71
- In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes rather than ton work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 70
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects (TPO 33) 60
- when teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 70
- teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, so, therefore, thus, while, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 306.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04575163399 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57565271885 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490196078431 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 461.7 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1318434637 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513360164105 0.272083759551 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169059237897 0.0996497079465 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951221436128 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2807177569 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772561106219 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.