Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
I completely agree that Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. It is responsibility of Educational institutes to guide students to success and to reach their potential in future. Learned and experienced professors can indicate students if they are likely to succeed and reach their potential or not.
By dissuading the students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed, they are helping the student to focus on different fields of study in which the student might rather excel and reach their potential. By dissuading they are saving the costs to educate a student who is unlikely to succeed in a particular field. Dissuading a student form pursuing a particular field of study does not mean that the student is going to fail in that field of study in the future but it means that the student is not likely to reach his or her full potential. Rather he might excel or reach a higher goal in some other field of study.
Some people may argue that by dissuading the students they are limiting the potential of students. The educational institutes are not limiting their potential, rather encouraging the student to pursue and concentrate on another fields of study in which they can truly reach their potential. People may also use Bill Gates as an example illustrating how a college dropout went to become a billionaire. I would like to say there are always exceptions to every claim and this is a general claim which addresses the masses.
Educational institutes do not guarantee that a student is going to fail rather enabling a precautionary measure which will help to success in future. In conclusion, I strongly agree with the claim that Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 50
- TOEFL Official Guide - Practice Test 2 - Integrated Writing - Professors on TV 3
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- TOEFL Official Guide - Practice Test 2 - Integrated Writing - Professors on TV 3
- TOEFL integrated writing: Altruism. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...to success and to reach their potential in future. Learned and experienced professors can...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...ely to reach his or her full potential. Rather he might excel or reach a higher goal i...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...nary measure which will help to success in future. In conclusion, I strongly agree with t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in which they are unlikely to succeed.
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.203592814371 0.240241500013 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.221556886228 0.157235817809 141% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0688622754491 0.0880659088768 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0359281437126 0.0497285424764 72% => OK
Pronouns: 0.062874251497 0.0444667217837 141% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.116766467066 0.12292977631 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0538922155689 0.0406280797675 133% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.90783257585 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.059880239521 0.030933414821 194% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0958083832335 0.0997080785238 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0239520958084 0.0249443105267 96% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0269461077844 0.0148568991511 181% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1914.0 2732.02544248 70% => OK
No of words: 318.0 452.878318584 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01886792453 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.58838876751 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.342767295597 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.276729559748 0.280924506359 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.201257861635 0.200843997647 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125786163522 0.132149295362 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90783257585 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 219.290929204 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.40251572327 0.48968727796 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 39.2946682675 55.4138127331 71% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6194690265 63% => OK
Sentence length: 24.4615384615 23.380412469 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4061955055 59.4972553346 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.230769231 141.124799967 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 23.380412469 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.461538461538 0.674092028746 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 52.1344944364 51.4728631049 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.16822429907 1.64882698954 71% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.57885824033 0.391690518653 148% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.197047517248 0.123202303941 160% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.115460710971 0.077325440228 149% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.619356265919 0.547984918172 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.136236510883 0.149214159877 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.296388600285 0.161403998019 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184847618797 0.0892212321368 207% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.425843990832 0.385218514788 111% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0541322261085 0.0692045440612 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.464575358218 0.275328986314 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829298366019 0.0653680567796 127% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.