Literature and culture
The professor explains the reason why reading general books and watch TV shows instead of literature doesn’t make the culture in general decline. The information she presents directly opposes the points outlined in the reading passage.
First of all, the speaker asserts that literature is not the only source people use to exercise imaginations and preserve the current culture. She argues that nowadays, many books are as well-written as novels. Reading books such as science and politics, in fact, also expands our understanding as well as imaginations. On the other hand, according to the reading, by reading less literature, the society is missing out the advantages of exercising imaginations, emphasizing other people, and sharpening our knowledge in language use since nothing else provides the intellectual stimulation other than literature does.
Secondly, the professor points out that reading books in general doesn’t necessarily mean that it makes people not appreciate their tradition. Nonetheless, watching a wide variety of TV shows and a music video can keep maintaining the value and culture that people hold tightly. However, the reading includes the information that reading the general books which is assumed superficial and poorly written and watching trivial forms of entertainment has lowered the level of culture in general.
Thirdly, the professor states that it’s fallacious if the authors blame the prospective readers for their lack interest in reading literature. Furthermore, she believes that lacking of audience happens because the modern literature such as novel and poems are often abstruse. On the contrary, the reading specifies that reading less literature may likely cause the desire of lead publishers in supporting serious writers go down.
- The following is a letter to the head of the tourism bureau on the island of Tria."Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry. In order to stop the erosion, we should charge people for 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 94
- A person should not take an important decision alone. 70
- People learn things better from those at their own level--such as fellow students or co-workers--from those at a higher level, such as teachers and supervisors. 70
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council."Two years ago, consultants predicted that West Egg's landfill, which is used for garbage disposal, would be completely filled within five years. During the pas 66
Comments
Essay evaluation report by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...iterature is not the only source people use to exercise imaginations and preserve t...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nonetheless', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'well', 'in fact', 'in general', 'such as', 'as well as', 'first of all', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.274193548387 0.261695866417 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.164516129032 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0838709677419 0.0723426182421 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0645161290323 0.0435111971325 148% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0290322580645 0.0277247811725 105% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116129032258 0.128828473217 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0677419354839 0.0370669169778 183% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.93728327984 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00645161290323 0.0208969081088 31% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00967741935484 0.00154638098197 626% => OK
Determiners: 0.0935483870968 0.128158765124 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00645161290323 0.0158828679856 41% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00967741935484 0.0114777025283 84% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1806.0 1645.83664459 110% => OK
No of words: 271.0 271.125827815 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.66420664207 6.08160592843 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.450184501845 0.374372842146 120% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.40221402214 0.287516216867 140% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.250922509225 0.187439937562 134% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.169741697417 0.113142543107 150% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93728327984 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594095940959 0.539623497131 110% => OK
Word variations: 63.0300999909 53.8517498576 117% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5833333333 21.7502111507 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9416733743 49.3711431718 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.5 132.220823453 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 21.7502111507 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 0.878197800319 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 62.8047355474 50.5018328374 124% => OK
Elegance: 1.775 1.90840788429 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213637845427 0.549887131256 39% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13064698477 0.142949733639 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0907261991268 0.0787303798458 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.62147307944 0.631733273073 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147400732238 0.139662658121 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110241094266 0.266732575781 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087857313785 0.103435571967 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.397612374918 0.414875509568 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00869396208929 0.0530846634433 16% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161889401037 0.40443939384 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270585902025 0.0528353158467 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 81, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...iterature is not the only source people use to exercise imaginations and preserve t...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'nonetheless', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'well', 'in fact', 'in general', 'such as', 'as well as', 'first of all', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.274193548387 0.261695866417 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.164516129032 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0838709677419 0.0723426182421 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0645161290323 0.0435111971325 148% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0290322580645 0.0277247811725 105% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116129032258 0.128828473217 90% => OK
Participles: 0.0677419354839 0.0370669169778 183% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.93728327984 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00645161290323 0.0208969081088 31% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00967741935484 0.00154638098197 626% => OK
Determiners: 0.0935483870968 0.128158765124 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00645161290323 0.0158828679856 41% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00967741935484 0.0114777025283 84% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1806.0 1645.83664459 110% => OK
No of words: 271.0 271.125827815 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.66420664207 6.08160592843 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.450184501845 0.374372842146 120% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.40221402214 0.287516216867 140% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.250922509225 0.187439937562 134% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.169741697417 0.113142543107 150% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93728327984 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594095940959 0.539623497131 110% => OK
Word variations: 63.0300999909 53.8517498576 117% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.5833333333 21.7502111507 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9416733743 49.3711431718 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.5 132.220823453 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 21.7502111507 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.66666666667 0.878197800319 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 62.8047355474 50.5018328374 124% => OK
Elegance: 1.775 1.90840788429 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213637845427 0.549887131256 39% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13064698477 0.142949733639 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0907261991268 0.0787303798458 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.62147307944 0.631733273073 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147400732238 0.139662658121 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110241094266 0.266732575781 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087857313785 0.103435571967 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.397612374918 0.414875509568 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00869396208929 0.0530846634433 16% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161889401037 0.40443939384 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270585902025 0.0528353158467 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.