Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time . This can beneficial for teenagers and the community as well. Do you agree or disagree.
Working for the society is a good thing for our community. Many types of NGO are helpful to our society and many teenagers like to help this types of NGO who work for our community.
There are so many benefits for the teenagers to spare their leisure time in this activity, while it is also helpful to our community. Firstly, young people develop their ability and learn how to communicate with the other's problem. They always try to solve the problems of others. " Teenagers are our next community members ". So that for the reason they should be required to do unpaid community work.
Secondly, they should try to develop their new ideas and new things. The new generation has new ideas that are why our community can go ahead with the new things and also helpful in the technology. They should work as a teamwork and be developing their skills. Also, they can boost their confidence and speak to others confidently.
Finally, they can get more benefit in this. They make their own thoughts. It also helps in their study because they should get the ability, own ideas, intelligence and how to communicate with their own problems.
All in all, I believe that teenagers spend their free time in community work because it is the benefit for them future and our society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-16 | jagrit sharma | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | jagrit sharma | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | jagrit sharma | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | baljit12 | 76 | view |
| 2020-10-19 | aidaaaa | 61 | view |
- Some people say that self employment is better than a job in a company or an institution. 56
- Life cycle of frog 78
- Many childrean these day have their own mobile phones What are the advantages and disadvantages 76
- Some people say that self employment is better than a job in a company or an institution. 56
- The diagram below show comparison of literacy rate of males ane females in 1990 and 2000 in six states of country 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...y and learn how to communicate with the others problem. They always try to solve the p...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 1615.20841683 66% => OK
No of words: 224.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78125 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61220994264 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 176.041082164 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495535714286 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 506.74238477 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6425291393 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.4 106.682146367 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9333333333 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31549915253 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114623586329 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955849675113 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183580303748 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0950081460973 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.0946893788 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 78.4519038076 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.