Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life.
It goes without saying that in such a sophisticated world where the technology growing so fast that it could hardly be believed, people are now more aware of happening events all around the world. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that it is not important to be aware of all incidents happen around the world, especially when they do not affect individual's daily life while others look at this concept through a different lens. From my vantage point, knowing all events that occur around the world not only can give us a good insight toward future events but also it is a good way to hear other people’s demand. In the following paragraphs, I will illustrate the most outstanding reasons.
First and foremost, the knowledge of happening events give us the opportunity to learn about the cause and effect of them. In this regard, we can be more prepared for upcoming events that may affect our society. For example, occurring an earthquake can encourage all architectures to design a better earthquake resistance building which might be neglected before. Besides, the world is becoming smaller and more complicated. Therefore, a single event can cause unexpected result all around the world. To illustrate, take an internal war as an example, it seems other societies having no deal with their problems, but it may affect our daily life in direct and indirect ways. For instance, the war may cause rising the price of oil which followed by increasing the price of other materials especially the imported ones. Hence, people should realize that being cautious of world’s events give them the chance of learning from others’ experiences, I guess.
Another subtle point that should be mentioned is that even if these events having no effect on our daily life, we should be kept in mind that we are all human and all people deserve to live in a good condition. In other words, we cannot ignore other people’s demands and live in an isolated society or country. I think, it is very selfish to close our eyes toward others’ difficulties in the name of irrelevant to us. For instance, there are many people in Africa who suffer from starvation disaster. It is our duty to help them in preparing their basic needs. In addition, these events may happen in our country in the future. We should help to solve others’ problems, if we expect others’ aid in our future disaster.
In conclusion, in the road of creating a borderless world, it is essential to be aware of all events that are happening around the world. As a result, we can enhance our knowledge of similar future events and also build a great world by helping each other. This is my deep belief that no matter how big a disaster is, when all people lend a hand to each other.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people. 71
- In some countries, teenagers have jobs while they are still student. Do you think this is a good idea? 73
- Do you agree or disagree?Only people who earn a lot of money are successful. 80
- Do you agree or disagree Reading fiction such as novels and short stories is more enjoyable than watching movies 79
- At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. Do you agree or disagree? 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, look, may, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, i guess, i think, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 43.0788530466 125% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2308.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8487394958 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6834894709 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1149917359 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.909090909 100.406767564 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77272727273 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205871422676 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0650856756794 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577737592513 0.0737576698707 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141603732378 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744728848265 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.