The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisolls where relevant.
The table illustrates the proportion of consumer expenditure on three different categories in five selected countries in 2002.
It is clear that Turkey stood out as spending on food and leisure far more than the others. Overall, in five different countries, residents utilized a huge amount of money on food, drinks and Tobacco, while those of leisure and education was trivial.
As is observed, the Turkish largest amount of money was spent on food at roughly 32%, followed by those of Ireland (28,91%). In comparison, the data of Italy, Spain and Sweden were fairly equal, at 16,36%, 18.8% and 15.77% respectively.
Even though Turkish total national expenditure accounted for almost half of the money, those of leisure and education was sharply lower at merely 4.35%. Moreover, Swedish total spending was the lowest at approximately 23%, which nearly similar to the data of Spain and Italy
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | mary.ssherr | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | fachryadul92 | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | vongocson | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-19 | Rahil shelat | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | alona2501 | 11 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie chart compares the percentage of commuters using for different types of transport in an European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 84
- The line graph illustrates the fish and meat consumption in gram per person per week in a European country between 1979 and 2004 88
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second paragraph shows the green house gas emission which result from this energy use 57
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17931034483 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65455433917 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648275862069 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.3503333626 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.285714286 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112422814853 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621508295174 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101079256546 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982010867059 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120901776627 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.