The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second paragraph shows the green house gas emission which result from this energy use
The pie charts illustrate the proportions of Australian household energy consumption and those of greenhouse gas exhaust.
The amount of gas exhaust is almost corresponded with types of energy consumption. In addition, Australian citizens spend most their energy on heating while much of gas emission was generated by water heating.
As is observed, the energy utilised for heating occupies 42%, which is almost as twice as its greenhouse exhaust (15%). In contrast, similarity can be witnessed in those of water heating, with 30% of energy use and 32% of gas emission.
Likewise, energy consumed for refrigeration is insignificant low at 7%, which is as half as the figure for gas exhaust. Moreover, Australian citizens use the minority of their energy for cooling and lightning and consequently they generate small amounts of gas exhaust which contribute 3% and 8% respectively
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-15 | promen9x1999 | 56 | view |
| 2017-02-15 | promen9x1999 | 84 | view |
| 2017-02-15 | promen9x1999 | 57 | view |
- The line graph illustrates the fish and meat consumption in gram per person per week in a European country between 1979 and 2004 88
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second paragraph shows the green house gas emission which result from this energy use 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisolls where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007(the graph in the picture given down below) 50
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, likewise, moreover, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 744.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 139.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35251798561 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43363162301 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04038344186 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58273381295 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3452356805 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.285714286 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255150006697 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130798048445 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371366242608 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170607930944 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149257031358 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.