The graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where revelant.
The line graph compares the proportion of population among four selected countries: the USA, Korea, China and India over the period from 1970 to 2030.
In general, there were upward trends observed in all four countries and they are expected to reach the highest percentages in 2030.
As can be seen clearly from the chart, both starting with 20 percent in 1970, the number of people in China and India remained stable or 20 years and 10 years respectively. After that, China experienced the dramatic increase to 60 percent in 2010 and it will be almost 70 percent in 2030. Similarly, the people number of India rose rapidly during 10 years then will gradually reach a peak at nearly 40 percent in the end of the period.
Standing at a doubled point compared with China and India in 1970, the number of Korean soared throughout 40 years and it is predicted to peak at 90 percent by 2030. As same as the trend saw in Korea, the figure for American number grew over the examined period then will peak at the same point as Korea’s in 2030.
- Some people believe that schools should only teach children subjects which are beneficial for their future career and therefore others subjects such as music and sports are not important.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 40
- Some people think the government should pay for health care and education but other people claim that it is the individual s responsibility Discuss both views and give your opinion 79
- some people think that criminals should be given longer terms in prison so as to reduce the crime rate To what extent do you agree or disagree 58
- more and more students choose to go to another country for their higher education. Do you think the benefits outweigh the problems associated with it? 84
- The graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, so, then, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59893048128 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39223390086 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540106951872 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.0226614719 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.857142857 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0789662770243 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0426812665866 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352548430695 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0617996477006 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341900746007 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.