The environment problem facing today's world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Government and large companies should responsible for the deducing the amount of damage being done to the environment. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is an alarming issue that environmental degradation is becoming more severe. While the government and enterprises should take their responsibilites for reducing the damage, I believe that individuals also aid to ameliorate the situation.
On the one hand, the government and companies should place a high priority on alleviating the problems. The government plays a leader role in maintaining the ordered society, meaning that they have the right to implement rules and regulations on citizens. To protect the environment, the government might impose green taxes on drivers, foster commuters taking public transport rather than driving. Due to the adverse impacts on environment, companies should take their actions too. They should invest in renewable energy from solar, wind or water power instead of consuming fossil fuel. This limits emissions from factories which are a vital factor in greenhouse effect leading to global warming.
On the other hand, individuals also help to reduce the negative effects on the environment. They can join one of the organizations which form part of the green movement, in order to campaign for people awareness. The rules of pollution reduction should be abided such as no smoking at public places, littering at prescribed places. By trying to be greener, customers should avoid buying over-packaged products and recycle as much as possible. For instance, they are encouraged to replace plastic material with reusable one on packaging. This slashes the vast amount of waste which does not break down easily after years.
In conclusion, along with draconian measures are taken by government and companies, I opine that law-abiding citizens also have a huge influence on environmental protection.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-14 | trungtrung | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-14 | trungtrung | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-10 | vananh220496 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-29 | lily2002 | 78 | view |
| 2018-05-06 | Netra patel | 39 | view |
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 73
- The bar chart below gives information about water use in China USA Russia and Australia in 2010 89
- The graph below shows the percentage of population in cities since 1970s with projection to 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 87
- The environment problem facing today's world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Government and large companies should responsible for the deducing the amount of damage being done to the environment. To what 67
- The movement of people from agricultural areas to cities can cause serious problems in both places. What are the serious problems and what measures can be taken the solve these problems? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 697, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...house effect leading to global warming. On the other hand, individuals also help...
^^^^
Line 4, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... influence on environmental protection.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47211895911 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96970883214 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646840148699 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4273733496 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.1333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166801174244 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509906894873 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309485334396 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0932272936466 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026620726928 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.