some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In the sense of behaviourism, people always behave on two personifications. First, they preserve the tradition and avoid a change, while others may confront that action. People always innovate, and static condition holds the innovative creation. Those two distinctive opinions may offend each other, however, there may possible to change without forgetting the existed costume.
A conservative tradition believes that change leads to destruction. For example, establishing an industrial company needs an enabled land. In so forth, deforestation occurs on behalf that building. Since the trees are falling, the pollution may inhibit human's air environment. This is one of the signs of the evolution of industrialisation from natural-exploited energy resources into modern-machinery technology that impact on our ecosystem. For this reason, some of the tribal communities hate modern technology that could harm the forest which is the source of living. In addition, they always maintain the old tradition, as such hunting animals for sports and consumption, and gardening for sustaining food storage.
Those phenomena seemingly make modern culture a bad personification than the tribal one. However, we have to aware that without innovation human could not invent new things and we will not discover a mystery that lays in our universe. Who said that modern technology always harms to the environment. People always learn from the mistakes that already did. So they create a marvel that can cooperate to nature. I think it is essence of change, always innovate, for example, from gas-fueled to electric energy or solar energy. This innovation decreases the pollution.
Above all, the conservatives have not too afraid of evolution. Because change makes human's civilisation step forward, and who does not follow the progress, they will trap and die conservatively.
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of the Japanese tourist market.Write a report for university lecturer describing the information shown below. 61
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas in the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows different levels of post-school qualification in Australia and the proportions of men and women who held them in 1999.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advanced technology which can prevent and solve a crime Do you agree or disagree 94
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in1999.summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 461, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...pact on our ecosystem. For this reason, some of the tribal communities hate modern technolo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Who” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...er a mystery that lays in our universe. Who said that modern technology always harm...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, while, for example, i think, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56690140845 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15804635721 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62676056338 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2759906825 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.05 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113910402914 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310409653173 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305154409288 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648574631278 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405486262722 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.43 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.