Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them?
In recent years, with the rapid development of technology and telecommunication, people receive information from marketing propaganda in numerous forms. I believe that in modern life, there is an intimate relationship between advertisement and people, the advertisement has a profound impact on the public and it requires authority and media need to have relevant measures to protect consumers from negative influences.
Admittedly, being the target audience, shoppers are directly affected by advertising campaigns. Firstly, buyers frequently find themselves purchasing tawdry goods, deceived by their portrayal in commercials. In order to outcompete rivals and create brand awareness, companies tend to exaggerate the true quality of their products. As a result, unwary consumers who are swayed by glamorous advertisements could end up impulsively buying items that later disappoint them. Secondly, regardless of their form, advertisements might encourage people to adopt harmful habits. Adolescents, for example, may spend too much time on video games if over-exposed to commercials promoting those products and celebrity endorsement.
Therefore, the strict measure should be taken to defend buyers from the adverse effect of commercials. It is most necessary for consumer protection agencies to be established and government must impose regulations on the advertising industry. Moreover, legal authorities have to give the solution to fine heavily behavior lacking personality. The mass media take account for reducing the negative influence of advertising. The consumer could choose the most suitable and reliable goods with the trust of the provider if companies show advertisement selectively.
In conclusion, I would argue that the negative effects commercial should be banned in the future and that people can only be protected from harms with interference from government and social media.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-30 | drsnn | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-23 | jay2041998 | 87 | view |
| 2018-11-25 | Tan0295 | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-01 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-26 | Kira Kira | 89 | view |
- Some people say young people playing electronic and computer games learn useful skills but some people say young people are wasting their time. Discuss and give your opinion. 78
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Modern technology now allows rapid and uncontrolled access to and exchange of information Far from being beneficial this is a danger to our societies To what extent do you agree or disagree 66
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.91666666667 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22836252869 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673913043478 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.83062185 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.642857143 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27929902924 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820723581708 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673401703571 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164242349114 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406563835476 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.