Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, by progressing the technology people can travel easier than before. They can travel from one country to another in a long distance only for a couple of hours. What is important here is how to travel. Some people prefer to travel alone by their own vehicles, while others have a negative attitude toward it and like to travel in a group by various transportation systems. As far as I am concerned, I agree that the best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide because of several reasons including saving the time and saving the money which are so important subjects in travel.
The time is the first noteworthy reason. Research showed that the most momentous issue which people concerned about that in traveling is the time. In other words, most of the time people regret after traveling since they have a lack of the time to see the place they traveled. With this in mind, the best way to remove this concerning is traveling in a group. A tour guide in a group had different experiences before in place and should help people to go the famous and valuable place in a limited time and thus people will have incredible experience there. Therefore, a tour guide has a profound effect on travel by managing the time.
Another substantial reason is about money. In this regard, it should be noted that people always try to have a cheap travel. One way which helps to minimize the cost of travel is a tour guide. Imagine a person who wants to travel alone. When he arrives the destination, he will go to different restaurants, hotels, shops which he has no information about their prices and thus he will spend money so much. Conversely, a person who travels in a group will go to the restaurants or various places which have a cheaper price since the tour guide had experience there and have information about them and thus he can save the money by getting advice from a tour guide. Hence, traveling in a group led by a tour guide has a huge impact on the money that we spend in travel.
In conclusion, we can reach the consensus that by traveling in a group led by a tour guide not only we can save the time but also it helps us to manage our money in travel. It is worth noting that if a person wants to travel alone, it is so important to have information about the destination which he wants to go.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Pakshid | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | 2507575150 | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | JohnSmith96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | JohnSmith96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Chara | 60 | view |
- tpo 11 76
- TPO 20 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Tpo 11 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to become financially responsible adults, children should learn to manage their own money at young age. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 110, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'cheap travel'.
Suggestion: cheap travel
...be noted that people always try to have a cheap travel. One way which helps to minimize the co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.46370023419 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49674194955 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428571428571 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.994623655914 201% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7731940246 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.35 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203370433759 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800624812733 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636118250487 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141998037671 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319056978098 0.0645574589148 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.