Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in schools
The notion that the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school, is a fascinating one, and one that I believe in. Maintaining valuable connections with people brings about several benefits. It helps you grow in your career, learn various things, and paves the way for obtaining practical experience.
First and foremost, when you have the ability to relate well to people, you can transform a lot of formal connections in to beneficial relationships. That is, you can maintain a mutual relationship with many people, and therefore, grow your business. Only by growing your business, can you increase your income. Furthermore, people with higher interpersonal skills have a higher chance of getting a promotion in their career. For instance, in a joint venture company, the company with the most business connections becomes the predominant, and makes the critical decisions.
Moreover, another remarkable aspect of being able to relate well to people is that you can learn numerous things from those whom you have a relation with. The more knowledge and experience you gain, the more you go up the career ladder. For example, my colleagues taught me a great number of things regarding my field of expertise. They were more experienced than me, and thus, they helped me achieve my goals, and reach where I am at the moment. In this respect, I am thankful to them.
Admiteddly, not to mention the importance of practical experience would be an oversight. Studying hard in the school merely gives you theoretical knowledge. In order to succeed, on the otherhand, you need practical experience. In this regard, Practical experienced is achieved only with the help of other people, in a working environment. Thus, relating well to people is of utmost priority to obtain practical experience.
All in all, it is crucial for people to be able to connect to other people. Relationships help us improve our business, convey valuable information, and provide us with the opportunity of having practical experience, whereas school has the sole purpose of providing us with theoretical knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | DHANDA | 90 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | naziii | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | sarah halawani | 65 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | liviapabreu | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Somayya | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they already know how to do well. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- TPO 21 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their political and social views known to students in the classroom. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roviding us with theoretical knowledge.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 345.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18260869565 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9392876498 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544927536232 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1549207264 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306893652312 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909219785831 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781681536916 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180009690333 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739298668023 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.