Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.
The question is whether being a leader is gained naturally and it is a kind of innate in some people or not. Everyone with regard to his private view point can maintain a specific direction toward this statement; however, I am inclined to refute the mentioned idea because management or leadership skills are social activities which can be learned in a logical way. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore them in following essay to empower my point of view:
To begin with, nobody could overlook this fact that each individual has a specific potential for improving his weakness and reinforcing his interpersonal skills. In my view, one should not forget that innate activities are usually found in animals. Some researchers believe that human beings do not include any instinct. It goes without saying that instinct is related to genetic actions. One may get gene of being strong from his father; however, a leader does not just need to have a sense of power in his group, but also his fail will be definite without knowing around people, moral principal and the ability of making decision in vital circumstance.
The second reason for my argument lies in the reality that nowadays, the most of universities offer management and leadership course. One should notice that basic and inborn activities do not require learning or instructing; hence, government never invests on trivial projects. In such a technology-driven world that people are competing with each other to obtain a high social status in the community, having a leader with powerful knowledge base can lead people to achieve his goals. The universities' course associated with leadership skill assist future leaders to acquire the needed education based on global knowledge.
Moreover, if a man fails to create a successful relationship with other members, it does not matter how strict he is, people will prefer not to rely on him; consequently, the most important factor in a group is that a living being has to make efforts to optimize his communication skill and this can be learn through making new friends from childhood.
To sum up, I strongly refuse the aforementioned suggestion because the first step in a leader's task is that he should be able to communicate with others and make logical decision in sensible times and all of these skills must be taught.
- Do you agree or disagree?Media are less concerned about the accuracy of news in compared with the past. 90
- do you agree or disagree?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 79
- do you agree or disagree? improving school is the most important factor for successful development of a country. 83
- tpo26 80
- tpo36 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a logical way" with adverb for "logical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... social activities which can be learned in a logical way. I feel this way for some reasons, whic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the universities') or simply say ''most universities''.
Suggestion: most of the universities; most universities
... lies in the reality that nowadays, the most of universities offer management and leadership course....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, as to, i feel, kind of, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1967.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 393.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00508905852 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78003999848 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58524173028 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.1344086022 149% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.117549642 48.9658058833 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.307692308 100.406767564 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2307692308 20.6045352989 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3846153846 5.45110844103 227% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223434245075 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770352407448 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350263434829 0.0737576698707 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121431512542 0.150856017488 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293846118644 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 11.7677419355 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 58.1214874552 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 86.8835125448 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.0537634409 139% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.247311828 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.