The environment problem facing today’s world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Government and large companies should responsible for the reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that tackling environment problem should be the government’s responsibility. However, I believe that this issue just could be solved properly with the help of both the government and individuals.
On the one hand, some enormous problems such as: global warming, natural resources depletion or deforestation require the government and large companies’ intervention. While the government has the right for the promulgation of law and planning for national using energy, the large groups of companies have a huge amount of money to deal with these problems. For example, Vietnam wants to invest more on renewable energy so the government spend most of national budget for investing on solar and wind power plants. According to National Power Plan VII, some wind or solar power plants would replace thermal plants which are harmful to the environment by 2030. Meanwhile, large companies can apply the most modern technology for their factories to reduce the pollutants releasing in the air. With the money they have, they can invest more on Research and Development to launch affordable and eco – friendly products.
On the other hand, ordinary people can also solve the environmental problems by doing some activities. Firstly, greenhouse affect can be dealt easier if people can cut the usage of air conditioner and fridge. These household equipments can emit carbon dioxide, which perforate the ozone layer. Secondly, vegetarian diet is another effective activity that ordinary people can do to solve the environmental problems. By eating less meat, people can reduce the pollutants and gas emission from raising cattle. Moreover, it also gives everyone a healthier lifestyle lengthening the life span. Last but not least, people can use public transport or use bike for commuting because this will decrease the number of cars and motorbikes on the street. Cutting the number of these kinds transportation means cutting the amount of air pollutants coming from these.
To sum up, environment problem facing today’s world should be the responsibilities of both large organizations like governments and companies and individuals living in the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-21 | dattu.vp79@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-21 | dattu.vp79@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-21 | dattu.vp79@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-03 | Kaur2000 | 67 | view |
| 2017-07-19 | thu_bbb | 87 | view |
- The environment problem facing today s world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation Government and large companies should responsible for the reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment To what ex 87
- Some people think the cheap air flight gives ordinary people move freedom However others think the cheap air flight should be banned because it pollutes the air and brings many other problems Discuss both views and give your opinion 82
- The bar chart below shows defence spending in 5 countries. 78
- The major cities in the world are growing fast as well as their problems. What are the problems that young people living in cites are facing with? Give solutions to their problems. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 74, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...oblems such as: global warming, natural resources depletion or deforestation require the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 771, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kinds'' or 'kind's'?
Suggestion: kinds'; kind's
...the street. Cutting the number of these kinds transportation means cutting the amount...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43657817109 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00156443519 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59587020649 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1145646878 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.411764706 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9411764706 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377285463488 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110201532789 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920865559983 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231147566653 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785308711578 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.