TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Truth be told, whether universities should spend money on salaries for university professors or not in order to improve the quality of education has generated a lot of controversy lately. The notion that increasing professors' income improves the quality of education is a fascination one and one that I believe in. In the following paragraphs I will postulate my arguments to support my belief.
First and foremost, professors of low and average income are reluctant to work, and are enthusiasm. Furthermore, they may either show aggressive behavior toward students, or redirect their distraught toward them. Low income is one of the contributing factors to people's dissatisfaction in life. That dissatisfaction leads to undesirable behavior is a known fact. For these reasons, universities should increase professors' salaries in order to encourage them to work with enthusiasm, and make them eager to do research. Also, when professors are avid and open, students are encouraged to focus on their education as well.
Moreover, another aspect of increasing professor's salaries is obliging them to fully commit themselves to university. In this respect, it can be mentioned that some professors may engage on other career activities along being a professor, in order to be able to provide for their family and satisfy their needs. For instance, some of my professors used to have a private company, therefore, they did spend a great deal of their time in their company, thereby, they devoted much less attention to the university than they should. If universities increase professors' salaries, they are less likely to engage on other activities, thus, they will have more time to spend on research and teaching.
Admittedly, not to mention the importance of motivating other people to start a career in academia would be an oversight. Only by defining highly paid jobs in academia, can we persuade young adults to choose a career in academia, and become a professor. The more people become professors, the more advancements we achieve in science and education. Consequently, universities can conduct research in a variety of fields, as well as scrutinize a certain research area with an excessive number of professors. All the aforementioned points contribute to improving the quality of education.
All in all, universities should increase professors' salaries if they want to improve the quality of education, because in this way, professors become more committed to their jobs, and more people will become professors, therefore, the quality of education will be improved substantially.
- Do you agree or disagree?Most advertisement make products seem much better that they really are. 86
- TPO 25 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in schools 73
- TPO-29 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 22 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...ersy lately. The notion that increasing professors income improves the quality of educatio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...e is one of the contributing factors to peoples dissatisfaction in life. That dissatisf...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2194.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39066339066 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11537060244 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503685503686 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 618.680645161 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5676535034 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.473684211 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4210526316 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17798411172 0.236089414692 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056680753301 0.076458572812 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656646783836 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11810288681 0.150856017488 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561425995646 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.