Modern forms of communication such as email and messaging have reduced the amount of time people spend seeing their friends. This has had a negative effect on their our social lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, telecommunication is developing quickly with many software is designed to meet the need of people such as chatting of received mail immediately. While I accept that this may suit many people, I believe that there are many aspects which modern forms of communication do not fully replace it.
On the one hand, almost activities of people can modernly work such as texting a message for co - worker by phone instead of directly talking about something. Notification or emails can rapidly send just after clicking a mouse without sending it through the post office and waiting for receiver's replies. Everything is convenient and easy. Moreover, the connection with old friends become simpler than before. By using a social network such as Facebook, Instagram or website, we can contact them who lost touch the previous day relatives live in the different region. Besides, friendship also spread to foreign friends through groups or clubs established by the internet. In addition, the information of employment, entertainment also update consecutively and regularly to improve people's knowledge.
On the other hand, some important works, sign a contract, for example, people obligatory show up at places where they make an appointment to bargain and exchange agreement. A few occupation makes by hands need to directly arrive at a workplace. For instance, workers, pupils and a laboratory medical technician. To find an accommodation as well as they hope, contact in person also is the most popular choice nowadays.
In conclusion, it is certainly true that forms of communication help us decrease a mount of time to work but this is by no means it absolutely replaces every activity of life even if it is more and more innovated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-18 | sherin rijo | 78 | view |
- Average annual expenditure on cell phone and residential phone service 2001 2010 63
- expenditure 61
- transport used during visit 56
- Essay topics In the past most people lived in small villages where everyone knew everyone else Nowadays most people live in large cities where they only knew a few people in their area What do you think were the advantages and the disadvantages of living 78
- Modern forms of communication such as email and messaging have reduced the amount of time people spend seeing their friends This has had a negative effect on their our social lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...ommunication is developing quickly with many software is designed to meet the need o...
^^^^
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun software seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much software', 'a good deal of software'.
Suggestion: much software; a good deal of software
...ommunication is developing quickly with many software is designed to meet the need of people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'accommodation'.
Suggestion: accommodation
... laboratory medical technician. To find an accommodation as well as they hope, contact in person...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, talking about, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18861209964 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00811236542 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686832740214 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0369755543 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120901833038 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313197565561 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365721140489 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689481712187 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362071799222 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.