Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future.
Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
In present-day society, there are already multiple companies with technological advances which are working to be competing for space tourism business. There are advocates who support the cruel of this act whilst the opponents are not favored that exploration leads to devastation. In my opinion, although I tend to believe that outer space travel could have beneficial outcomes, it might potential effects on people and environment negatively.
On the one hand, it is widely acknowledged that space tourism has been advantageous to humans in different ways. One of the especially merits of space exploration will be brought numerous expected economic growths. In other words, this sector will generate the massive profits for the investor due to outer space travel is a rich man’s game and ticket cost for a single seat above $200,000, right now. Besides, space tourism is an extremely wide industry hence it will open a path for various job opportunities, especially for pilots, programmers, and manufacturing jobs. Furthermore, education will be significantly improved. The actual experience will create an opportunity to discover unknown facts and generate valuable knowledge regarding the universe. In fact, if people come across an event which they are truly strange with afterward the tendency to learn it also grows.
On the other hand, the downsides of space travel are indispensable. It is true that space tourism contains plenty of potential risks. Space transportation is inherently risky to humans, whether they are trained astronauts or paying tourists, given that spaceflight is still in its relative infancy. No matter how developed technology is if catastrophe strikes in outer space, humans life seem to be trapped. Moreover, space tourism could have major consequences for Earth’s climate. In recent years, numerous studies published raised concerns that the growing commercial spaceflight industry could accelerate global warming since an abundance of non-renewable sources is used in this sector.
In conclusion, the development of space tourism is necessary. However, there should have multilateral supervision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-05-30 | anhnguyen97ctn@yahoo.com | 78 | view |
| 2017-11-14 | ittovo92 | 96 | view |
- Wheat Exports from 1985 to 1990 (in million tonnes) 78
- The bar chart below shows the proportions of English men and women of different ages who were living alone in 2011. The pie chart compares the numbers of bedrooms in these one-person households.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
- More and more young people from wealthy countries are spending a short time in communities in poorer countries doing unpaid work such as teaching or building houses.Why? Who benefit from this, the community or these young people? 84
- Comparison between Meadowside village and Fonton development over three periods (1962, 1985 and the present) 73
- The chart below shows average hours and minutes spent by UK males and females on different daily activities 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 634, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...ion will be significantly improved. The actual experience will create an opportunity to discover ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, still, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62345679012 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03774582716 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62037037037 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.224705817 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.222222222 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296255655292 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948750924237 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721768928637 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185429429476 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022169866797 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.02 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.