tpo34
The reading passage and the lecture both discuss the reasons of sea cows extinction. On the first hand, the reading state that there are theories responsible toward the sea cows extinction. On the other hand, the professor explain that these theories are not true and refutes each of the reading reasons.
First of all, the article claims that groups of Siberian people over hunted the sea cows because it were a good source of food. however, The lecture argues that sea cows were huge creature unless they hunted these animals it was not the main reason due to small number of them.
In addition, the reading makes the argument is that the disturbance of ecosystems caused a sever decline in the food like a klep that was the main supply to the sea cows. The lecture argues this point by stating that when the ecosystem changed that will had a impact on all creatures not just the sea cows, and the professor provide an example that the ecosystem will affect on whales also.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that an European the main reason of hunting after 1741. The lecture counter this claim by pointing out that the extinction happened before European coming, and they were a small group of people.
- Nowadays universities are the best place to get the best knowledge from, it. Also, it became an important part of our life in spite of taking valuable information from many different fields, we face much new experience we do not face it before. Furthermor 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting 50
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Typically, as people age, their bone mass decreases, making them more vulnerable to bone fractures. A recent study concludes that the most effective way to reduce the risk of fractures in later life is to take twice the recommended dose of vitamin D and c 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cows'' or 'cow's'?
Suggestion: cows'; cow's
...are theories responsible toward the sea cows extinction. On the other hand, the prof...
^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... because it were a good source of food. however, The lecture argues that sea cows were ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...hen the ecosystem changed that will had a impact on all creatures not just the se...
^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...vide an example that the ecosystem will affect on whales also. Lastly, the reading pas...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...hat the ecosystem will affect on whales also. Lastly, the reading passage argues ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...Lastly, the reading passage argues that an European the main reason of hunting aft...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, lastly, so, in addition, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 1373.03311258 73% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76303317536 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21346802854 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526066350711 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 419.366225166 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1850657107 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.666666667 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355310786084 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160258842741 0.0996497079465 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869607100875 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211460792088 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784589640706 0.0443174109184 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.8541721854 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.