Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion?
Support it with personal examples.
The substantial influence of family responsibilities has sparked a controversy among the people around the globe. While specific argument claimed that family responsibilities for children are critical, a group of intellectuals debate otherwise and hold an opponent's view. I am highly inclined to believe that parents must take child's responsibilities legally. The agenda of this article is to refine both sides of the arguments, which clarify how it impacts pupils, family, as well as social communities, and will lead to a legitimate conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why family-support legalization is vital. The most remarkable one lies in the fact that it could lead to social and child equality. Besides, recently it is alleged that child achievements have a 57% positive correlation with their background and 27% related to their efforts. An outcome of prominent university's study uncovered that family activists have 100% positive effects on social justice. Hence, legalizing of family's responsibilities over children related to child needs, child outcomes, child interaction, child education, as well child interactions.
Nevertheless, there remain drawbacks, which can unquestionably overwhelm the influence of the family social responsibilities, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that the family crisis and a single-parent family might lead to social crisis and social corruptions. From my own experience, I have been suffered significantly twice as others from my family poor-outcomes which lead to my lower achievements at a university. Therefore, the lack of legal support for family children and its outcomes which may have adverse effects on social justice, social welfare, social family, as well as social responsibilities, is notable.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling on both sides, my sentiment is that the benefits of legalized and supported family responsibilities on our future children far outweigh its drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-24 | raminhafezi@yahoo.com | 80 | view |
| 2017-11-24 | raminhafezi@yahoo.com | 77 | view |
| 2017-11-24 | raminhafezi@yahoo.com | 80 | view |
| 2017-11-24 | raminhafezi@yahoo.com | 77 | view |
| 2017-11-24 | raminhafezi@yahoo.com | 80 | view |
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 85
- should companies emphasise their reputation rather than short term strategies? 88
- Television has two roles to inform and to entertain Explain which of these roles you see as more important To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way Support your point of view with details from your own exp 88
- Television has two roles: to inform and to entertain. Explain which of these roles you see as more important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way? Support your point of view with details from your own 85
- Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 475, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... clarify how it impacts pupils, family, as well as social communities, and will lead to a ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6889632107 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42044174146 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558528428094 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4163062664 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.846153846 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128104416836 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525179073044 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425345252639 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910300383032 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247001895521 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.