Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women.
To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.
In this day and age, employment has become a controversial topic among public all around the world. I am inclined to highly believe that genders have a little influence on employment as both men and women could fulfil any kind of job if they are trained and taught about. For the purpose of this essay, I would discuss both sides.
To begin with, there are several reasons why I support no relation between genders and employment. First and foremost is that male and female human beings can do any job just if they have been taught or have achieved the appropriate knowledge. Secondly, It is highly argued that women are rooted in the fact they are fragile, therefore society and culture underestimated them and separate the jobs to hard and soft and assign the soft jobs to the women. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I was keen on being a pilot, and there is a cultural rule that a female pilot could not have any job in the future. Therefore, it is highly obvious that society can cause the growth of this kind of beliefs.
However, there is no doubt that this belief can provide people with various negative points. Each gender should have their own types of employment. In addition to this information, It is strongly claimed that there are so many jobs which woman are not interested in and these are related to this reality that men are stronger than women. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by Tehran University researchers in 2010 has shown that the number of women in the university is more than men, which is negatively correlated with the belief that education is not suitable for women and they should stay at home and be a perfect housewife. Hence, it is quite clear that society can cause discrimination.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, my personal sentiment is both men and women can do any kind of jobs. Although society and culture try to conversely approve that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-29 | Muhammad Khaleeq | 70 | view |
| 2018-04-14 | priyanka pinky | 62 | view |
| 2017-11-26 | maryam2 | 77 | view |
| 2017-11-26 | maryam2 | 72 | view |
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land therefore they should be banned To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 90
- Some types of employment are more suitable for men and other types of employment are more appropriate for women.To what extent do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience. 77
- people emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new roads for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- Whether designing of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- some people think that cars should be banned from large citie. to what extend do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, kind of, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 10.5418719212 237% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 20.9802955665 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 344.0 242.827586207 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 3.92707691288 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5738681372 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531976744186 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7521797634 50.4703680194 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.933333333 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201701291316 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603113283342 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402564191528 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111655473091 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526787365246 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.5310837438 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.