Some people believe law changes human behavior. Do you agree/disagree?
These days’ laws play an essential role in every aspect of human life due to its importance to every society for being in a specific order and harmony. Although some people tend to believe that laws can deeply affect human behavior, I, along with other groups, profoundly inclined to believe that laws just guided us in the right directions. Following paragraphs will assess both sides of this arguments by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why I tend to believe that setting laws in every society is of necessity. First and foremost, it is essential for preventing criminal activities in every facet of the human community. Secondly, laws encouraged every inhabitant to act in some certain restricted manners and ways, which conjunction with preventing chaos. According to an academic research conducted by Tehran University, crime rate amongst youngsters, who have been taught by basic citizenship laws, has fallen drastically. However, human nature is immutable and could not change by enforcement laws.
On the other hand, opponents argued that imposing laws in every part of a human community could lead to raising social fears of getting punished. They use an indispensable valid logic to support their idea while anxiety in young members of society could lead to depression and many other disoriented behaviors. Actually, it infuses a fear among the public that they might get punished for every little wrong action. Not to mention that human nature and behavior are inborn qualities and cannot be changed; however, it could be controlled by some regulations.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that law is a two-edged sword, so could have both beneficial or detrimental impacts on human life. It is government’s responsibilities to increase public awareness to prevent crime commitment before any harmful action.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 74 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-03-23 | Nina Tsarevich | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | topraveesh | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-24 | topraveesh | 80 | view |
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples. 36
- In town and cities the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop Do you agree or disagree 94
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
- Using of Over-packed food could be bad. to what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90297931251 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623333333333 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6676949665 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.428571429 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237876623145 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786792647149 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789282436513 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139409339928 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723641860469 0.0609392437508 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.