some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The 21st century saw the breakthrough in the improvement of education with manifold ideas to develop the children at their best. Still, the idea that unpaid community service is under consideration to be a mandatory subject of high school curriculum remains constant debate among people. In my opinion, this idea should be repelled.
There is no disputing the fact that doing community service does good to students. It will open up a great opportunity for students to get exposed to the real world, teach them invaluable lessons that schools cannot do. Also, these community works will aid students with interpersonal skills, which plays an indispensable role in their life in the future. Furthermore, doing community service will probably encourage student's instilling patriotism as well as foster children to make great contributions to our country.
On the other hand, unpaid community service should not be regarded as a compulsory part in high school. The first reason is that community service is voluntary work, which means schools do not have right to force students to serve the community if they do not want to. In addition to that, forcing students to serve community free of charge could be considered as children labour exploitation because these services require a lot of arduous work. Apart from that, we should not forget the main duty of students, which is to concentrate on their study. Doing community service is very time - consuming. Therefore, Students will no longer have time to study and develop themselves if they are reluctant to doing community service. This would instill their hatred for making contributions to the community.
For all intents and purposes, letting children to permeate into the world via serving community is a good idea but forcing them to do that free of charge will counteract the benefits of serving the community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-01-12 | Phạm Phương Thanh | 73 | view |
- Discuss about whether the Internet is the best tool to find information? What do you think? 73
- some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at a primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- There is a disagreement on the impact of increased business and culture contact between countries on a country's identity. What is your opinion? 84
- some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmesTo what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Discuss about whether the Internet is the best tool to find information? What do you think about it 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, still, therefore, well, apart from, as to, in addition, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17161716172 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78475076529 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564356435644 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8063556968 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.466666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263512969751 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106735721858 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105496853953 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151276008854 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820282357623 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.