Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of parents’ responsibility for children and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that control the children is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that confine children can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the sociology standpoint, street crime can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that violence, as well as financial problems, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered divorced parents. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both family support and social training apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychology, alcoholic parents might increase the consequences of social crime. Moreover, fundamental aspects of law offending relate to this reality that the demerits of children behavior pertain to personal responsibility. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of abdicating responsibility is correlated negatively with abused by children. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of social behavior.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I
profoundly believe that the benefits of direct responsibility far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of parents’ responsibility prove the significance of sole responsibility, but also pinpoint ultimate responsibility implications.
- People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, whitewater river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why? 11
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing What are the reasons for that 80
- You are given climate change as the field of study. Which area will you prefer? 11
- In this technological world the number of new inventions has been increasing Please describe a new invention and determine whether it will bring advantages or disadvantages 85
- Do you think English will remain a global language despite globalization? Discuss you views with examples. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95510204082 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.506523937 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677551020408 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.560468387 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.583333333 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202417886254 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653024468694 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624043057075 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930834895538 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762589488528 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.