task 1: the consumption of four different food groups per person per week
The line graph provides information about the expenditure on four different food groups per person per week in a European nation from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, it is clear that while the consumption of Beef, Lamb, and Fish decreased, there was an upward trend in the amount of Chicken consumed over the 25-year period. Additionally, the amount of Fish eaten was lowest during the research given.
In 1979, there were over 200 grams in the consumption of Beef per person per week and then decreased gradually to about 170 grams in next decade despite some wide fluctuations. At the same time, The figure for Lamb and Chicken were lower at exactly 150 grams and under 150 grams respectively in 1979. After the period of 25 years, the consumption of Chicken went up dramatically before reaching the highest point of the whole line graph, at almost 250 grams a person a week in 2004. By contrast, the number for Lamb declined sharply to roughly 50 grams at the end of the period.
Although the spending on Beef varied considerably, it experienced a significant decrease by 70 grams, ending at 100 grams in 2004. Meanwhile, Fish was the least popular food with only 60 grams eaten in 1979. The figure then fell slightly throughout the period to nearly 50 grams per person each week in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | truongquangwt | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | haieric96 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-11 | khoavodoj | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | mohammad.iraf | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-30 | justtheanh | 78 | view |
- task 1: member of parliament 78
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- task 1: Vietnamese student 61
- task 1: the consumer price index 84
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centres or malls to do their shopping? Is this a positive or negative development? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77232142857 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56285385188 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558035714286 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8112417146 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.9 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267729486491 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10951840668 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147641445739 0.0843802449381 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194516295079 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.168739855815 0.0819641961636 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.